The fuck is this thread

@Stouty said:
crush came on with me and tested it, seemed pretty much fine on officials although there may be some server packetloss flashing in at times, they're looking into it

Thanks for taking the devs and bringing it to their attention

It's the disease.



It spreads once more

For those who might know, there was a DLC for Chivalry which is called Deadliest Warrior, and contained shit like ninjas, spartans, pirates, samurais and vikings (although you kind of can have vikings right now with the current gear)

Although the DLC was pretty shit, I thought it would be an interesting concept, and the maps were pretty good. I guess after release and the game being done, with mod tools and everything out, maybe Triternion could take up these concepts and add some kind of "era DLC" to the game, with maps for the gamemodes available.

Maybe "Pirates" are a little far weird, although with modding any kind of shit can be done, but imagine playing as Samurais in an Asian Frontline map. I suppose that would make for some memorable gameplay, and it keeps the game fresh. The only problem with this is the divide of the playerbase. Anyway, I am not really sure about this kind of DLC or Content Update, but I thought it would be interesting.

LOD Prop Render Bug based on distance:

FAR:

CLOSE:

For some reason the materials for the walls in the center of the picture appear to reverse themselves

I don't really know about the archer limits.
It was in chivalry and it didn't bother me. To be honest, I think it was better that way. Archer limits should probably only be in team based gamemodes. By doing it that way, it didn't really make the game bad or anything, but it would've been worse if everyone could go archer.

@ArmedSpartan said:
Ok, I've now found out when release tier backers were let in. It was back in Mid-September.
https://mordhau.com/forum/topic/13622/dev-blog-4-road-to-release-and-kickstarter-access/

Yeah, it looks like you are right, I thought that was going to happen some months after that post, but I guess it was better to jump later in the game anyway, the more patches the better for my first impressions.

@ArmedSpartan said:
Besides Beta backers, I believe release backers were allowed in because of triternion's previous "Release date estimates" because when Alpha released, they initially said full release would be in 2018. Since they've been taking more time developing the game, they felt it they'd let the regular release backers in too...(Memories might be fuzzy!)

I am a release backer, not a beta backer, and A month or two ago when I checked my account I did not remember having the key given to me, it used to say something along the lines of "Product release TBA" Or something, but I still got it now.

First Impressions:
Great Soundtrack
Great Menu
Great Customization, I think I've spent an hour in it already.
Combat: Feels Responsive, looks good. My Chivalry Instincts kick in. So far it's amazing
Performance: Runs very smooth, Marox has not joke around when he said he will make this run for competitive standards.
Can't wait for what the future holds

Although I have backed for the release version of the game, I have received my key to join the BETA, like I remember asking about some months ago. I don't know when the devs let the release backers play the BETA, but I just randomly checked and I got the key.

THANK YOU SO MUCH!

Judging by how well Steve has treated Chivalry, it was always about the fucking money.
If Chivalry was so loved by "Steve and his team", we would have not needed Mordhau in the first place.

I am siding with Scott, based on this conclusion. I tried to look at both sides of the story, but frankly, after looking at Chivalry from a customer's perspective, I know who wanted what and did what. Steve just wanted the cash, Scott perhaps even if he had some issues, he wanted a damn good game.

If Triternion wants to get in touch with him and perhaps see if he would be a good employee, then I believe he is a good asset.

Fortius quo fidelius

1:15 --- I hope you weren't serious by calling people misogynists.

1:00 --- Also, those who say women can't handle large and heavy weapons went overboard, because it's not that none of them are able to handle it, but the majority can't. Same with women in battle in medieval armor.
Besides having social difficulties, there's so few of them that could actually do anything like medieval fighting. It was the same in ALL wars.
(Just a quick side note: Women in the Soviet Army were snipers to fight at long range because close range they were ineffective. A.K.A. Biology and nature decided that the two genders fulfill different roles.)

1:45 --- For the love of God, this "argument" again. this reminds me of Battlefield 5. There are changes that are supposed to be made for gameplay reasons, and there are changes which do not serve gameplay reasons and are just there for the sake of existing or to prove a point/push an agenda. In this game it's not the case, but BF5 for example added this retarded feminist agenda to the mix by using the same argument about "Muh realism". Adjusting gameplay to be great has nothing to do with social norms about genders and the need for them to exist and be displayed "equally". Whatever, this one is a little off the point, but I get PTSD when I see this specific "argument" brought on the table when it's purely retarded to begin with. (Not attacking you Stouty, I am attacking the Idea; God loves the man, not the sin)

That's it.

From a realistic perspective, yes, Women have no place in Mordhau.
But by it's design since the armor looks the same, it's going to be fine.

Everything else is either marxist cunts trying to invoke "muh equality".

Modders can make realistic "damage". Interesting concept.

@EatAtRedLobster said:
I felt you deserved something special for your work, Niko. Alcohol had been consumed. A sudden impulse became reality.

https://clyp.it/mdnemn1a?token=d1957556a7dd60fe6303d01745f4dd98

Many regrets.

I am honored.

@ÐMontyleGueux said:
That's why I suggested early access in late 2018. Most early access games stay that way for years and years, EA isn't bad if it's only for a few months. I mean that's pretty much what they did for beta backers as well, they gave access even through the game wasn't in beta yet.

Well, I pledged for the release, that was estimated on delivery for march 2018, yet I didn't get any early access just for the sake of playing with people. I mean, it's only the satanic 666 people that got the release version that didn't get to play. The Beta guys did. And is it Beta? It's not. So why not let those who pledged for release join earlier? (without making the game EA, just letting the KICKSTARTER backers play it)

ohno

And also there needs to be metioning that the developers said with their own mouths that their game "portrays ww2 realistically", so the Medal of Honor game had no problems because the devs didn't label realism on top of it.

When people who want historical accuracy find retarded feminist bullshit on the game after being told otherwise by the developers brought rightly deserved backlash.
Oh, and their preorders are ~87% behind Black Ops 4, who is mediocre anyway, so I guess I have seen the power of consumers. Thank God people still use their brains.

Back then games were not popular.
However, in Battlefield V you have a woman, that jumps from buildings, and shoots people with a hook for an arm.
I mean, disabled women? Who the fuck thought that wasn't way too retarded?
Oh ,and don't forget black disabled women in the Reich Army for good measure.

Absolutely disgusting.