Mordhau
The Mordhau Alpha is out!

If you have backed the game on Kickstarter or bought it on our shop, check your e-mail for a message from us. You will have to create an account and confirm your purchase, then head over to your purchases to redeem the Steam key.

 DerFurst
Count
  • Likes received 6598
  • Date joined 26 Oct '15
  • Last seen 13m

Private Message

Count 3171 6598

Really Huggles? I can tell the difference between most Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese, Chinese, and Mongolians... Asians are supposed to be the hardest to figure out...

Europeans have the most genetic variation (in so far as phenotypes) of any people in the world. Unlike other races where you have to tell the difference by looking at just their faces, Europeans have a wide array of easily spotted differences... Whereas everyone else either has brown or black eyes and black hair, Europeans have white, bleach blond, gold blond, dirty blond, brown, dark brown, red, and auburn hair colors, with silver, blue, green, hazel, cyan, and brown eye colors... They're literally the easiest to figure out based on superficial differences. You're just a racist against white people m'dude

Count 3171 6598

@Pred said:

@DerFurst said:
Limiting the turncap to kicks so they can more effectively be side-strafed would be both balanced and realistic.

While I agree kicks need something to be done about them, how is side-strafing them realistic? It's literally impossible IRL.

They're obviously not running around in circles, but they are demonstrating that if the defender moves aside of the attacker's front kick while deflecting, the defender can avoid the front kick and come in for a strike. Translate that to gameplay where you can't represent everything realistically and you have people dodging kicks by moving aside of them.

Again though, it's gameplay that matters. Kicks are extremely strong and cheesy, and need some kind of footwork counterplay to make sure it's riskier considering the great reward of a free hit.

Count 3171 6598

Kicks are very easy to use offensively, and can be used against slower opponents who are backpedaling to get a free cheese hit if they don't react. The range of the kick is quite far, but I'm not sure how I'd feel about nerfing range as the solution to kicks. Kicks still need to catch people who are fast or using longer weapons trying to dance out of range. Limiting the turncap to kicks so they can more effectively be side-strafed would be both balanced and realistic.

Sometimes you want to be ultra aggressive and facehug. When fighting weapons like the halberd or spear, you need to get close to be effective with your weapon. However, since you can't avoid kicks if you facehug that close, you have to hover just outside their range, in a zone less optimal for you weapon, but in their weapon's kill-zone. That's not a good option either, so you really have to outskill them - which is an uphill battle. It's logical that a long weapon's bane is to be facehugged, but facehugging is really easy to deal with since kicks can be dragged pretty much 90 degrees. It's a bad situation where the longer weapon gets the double advantage of being out of range and baiting kicks easier too.

Count 3171 6598
  • 17 Oct
 DerFurst

@Survii said:
kBFMpCCkyOTJfNjE07SE_LjVJZB-6m2vNfq_wDRl7j4.jpg

Just report that shit on the road tbh

Is that guy driving on the road at 300 mp/h? He looks like he's going into hyperspace

Count 3171 6598
  • 17 Oct
 DerFurst

It's certainly not a discussion about anything. In fact I'd say it's just posturing from insecure reactionaries

Count 3171 6598
  • 17 Oct
 DerFurst

@nohbdy said:
Oh, and those previous arguments with DerFurst? Exact same intellectually dishonest tactics as he's always used. At this point I can't even tell if it's deliberate or he's just so stupid that he actually thinks what he's doing is good argumentation.

Count 3171 6598
  • 17 Oct
 DerFurst

@nohbdy said:
Gotta love all the insecure posturing reactionaries do

How's that open discussion going

Count 3171 6598
  • 17 Oct
 DerFurst

@King Sinclair The FluffyDragon said:
And yet its a sin when I do it
Get it?
Cuz the name

yea, but the legs you like are usually quadrupedal or reverse jointed

Count 3171 6598
  • 16 Oct
 DerFurst

It's like a frogmouth but worse... please don't show anymore of that

Count 3171 6598
  • 16 Oct
 DerFurst

This had me laughing hard

Count 3171 6598
  • 2
  • 16 Oct
 DerFurst

@SIEGE said:

@DerFurst said:
You also kill homosexuals, but there's plenty of baby diddlers and closet homos there still

I have never heard of someone getting beheaded for homosexuality, we have millions of gayos with their heads attached. We barely behead homogayos.

Premarital sex in itself is illegal, so there is no age of consent but you can get married if you're 18, however, if you're above 18 and you have sex with someone below 18, and you're caught, you get the same punishment as an adulterer + extra to make it more spicy

I never said Muslims behead gays, but that they kill them. Throwing people from high buildings is much faster than waiting for a beheading. From what you've told me, legal beheadings take a long time to get the courts to agree to, and so there's a very small amount per year. The people who follow Sharia law (in their hearts, not by the law of the government) are usually the ones who kill the gays.

Take this passage for example:

Sec. p17.1: In more than one place in the Holy Koran, Allah recounts to us the story of Lot’s people, and how He destroyed them for their wicked practice. There is consensus among both Muslims and the followers of all other religions that sodomy is an enormity. It is even viler and uglier than adultery

Here the Quran is saying that homosexuality is worse than adultery, and if you punish adulterers severely, then you ought to punish homosexuals even worse... unless it's one of those "yea we really don't care about that part of the Quran anymore" things.


This speaker Qureshi also admits, and so do the Sunni Muslim people in this video, that Muslims believe in severe punishment of homosexuals, that whatever Allah puts in the Quran must be followed, and that views that westerners call "extreme" are actually normal and held by regular muslims.

edit: forget the stupid ass thing at the end of the video, I don't agree with that part at all

Count 3171 6598
  • 16 Oct
 DerFurst

@SIEGE said:
you know, we behead rapists.

You also kill homosexuals, but there's plenty of baby diddlers and closet homos there still

Count 3171 6598
  • 16 Oct
 DerFurst

@nohbdy said:
That sounds pretty impressive if it were true. It's more so that you Nazi fools can't even hold a conversation with me and never have.

Eventually we get tired of arguing with you because you refuse to admit you're wrong about anything. What kind of debate can we have if you do this? It's just a shouting contest. It doesn't matter what you say at that point, it just matters that you keep saying it until the other guy gets tired or bored and backs off. This is a cartoon character's version of an argument; even Plato wouldn't know what to do with you at that point.

I provide a counter argument; you just deflect it with a straw man that attempts to re-frame my argument in a ridiculous light that you have made up, leading me to repeat myself.

In the most recent argument, you explained that immigration is good and that wanting to keep people out based on culture/race was xenophobic and bad. I explained that immigration is only good if the people you're inviting are willing/capable of assimilating and actually desire to improve your country, rather than just compete for dominance with the people already living there and having constant cultural/racial conflicts. I then explained that altruism is a good tool around friends and dangerous when used with people who consider you their competition rather than friend. None of that was a straw man. In fact, by saying this, you just made a fucking straw man - that's unreal man...

I provide evidence against you; you deflect it with a red herring and ignore it, leading me to start repeating myself again.

Provide evidence of you providing evidence in that last debate will you? All you did then was repeat your talking points with no modification whatsoever.

I call you out on your bullshit; you try to play the oh-so rational "big man" who wants a totalitarian ethno-state, appealing to onlookers' emotions to mask the absurdity of your ideas.

I explained to you that if you're extremely positive towards the immigration of alien peoples and extremely negative towards ethnic and cultural preservation, then that would make you a xenophile, the opposite of a xenophobe. That's not demagoguery, it's completely reasonable and fucking true.

The fact that you seem to get so much support in spite of your completely obvious demagoguery honestly makes me worry about people's critical thinking skills.

You're not going to win people over by guilting them or making them feel stupid for not agreeing with you.

It seems that most people truly aren't well-equipped enough to handle debate, whether it be for participating in it or interpreting it as an onlooker. That being said, I don't mean to insult other people who are reading this though.

You're bound to insult people when you call them stupid for disagreeing though, so trying to say "I don't mean to" doesn't change what you wrote... Either you call them stupid for disagreeing or you don't. You can't have your cake and eat it.

It's not your fault that we live in a society that conditions us to obey, to surrender our consciousness at the sight of charisma, and does not try to properly prepare us for these kinds of situations.

I wouldn't want people to "surrender" themselves to anything I say. I hate it when people ape ideas or defend each other's ideas for purely social rather than rational reasons. People should always be critical with what I say, because it keeps me honest.

I sort of must thank you though. After about 5 years of wasting my time, fruitlessly debating my intellectual opponents, I now have something resembling actual evidence and proof of its pointlessness.

How do you think anarcho-communism is going to work in the future when you're having such fruitless arguments with opinionated people now?


This is truly hell. It's insanity. Why do I even do this with you people.

Count 3171 6598
  • 1
  • 16 Oct
 DerFurst

@vanguard said:
It is true though, you nazibois are coward as fuck in debates, only use intelectual dishonesty, or not even answer our arguments properly. That is, when you fuckos answer at all and not simply meme or just run away.

Like you just did! Thanks Punzy

You guys are masters at saying you've done something that you haven't done, and accusing other people of things they didn't do.

For the record, the way the debate usually goes is "ur a fucking natzee hahhaha i'd exterminate u to be honest" and then I have to defend myself over and over and over again. I get tired of that and just want to say what I have to say, so I largely ignore the retarded accusations you make all the time. It's not worth defending myself when giving my position makes people see what you're saying isn't true anyway.

Count 3171 6598
  • 2
  • 15 Oct
 DerFurst

@SIEGE said:

@DerFurst said:
Why would you write an infallible book if you're only supposed to follow less than half of it and only follow it in a certain order? God wouldn't write a book that poorly made and easily misunderstood...

And even further, why would God be happy with you doing something at a certain time period then be upset at you and tell you not to do the exact same thing within the same context years later? Did he change his mind?

People needed guidance tbh yes

What's any of this got to do with the retardation of Isis?

A person's religion is a reflection of their nature, and their nature is a reflection of their religion

To say that ISIS is separate from Islam is foolish... If it weren't for Islam, ISIS would not have any precedence for its beliefs. In order to be "radical" you must have a starting point... There are very, VERY few radical "Buddhists" for example who are willing to kill people because they misconstrued the Buddha's teachings (save for some fringe examples). Violence is inherent to the nature of Islam. One can choose to place that aggression elsewhere, but it's always there. Buddhism, for example is by its very nature nonviolent, and it takes a huge step then for it to become violent. It takes far less to provoke a Muslim to violence than a Buddhist. Do you get the point?

Count 3171 6598
  • 1
  • 15 Oct
 DerFurst

Why would you write an infallible book if you're only supposed to follow less than half of it and only follow it in a certain order? God wouldn't write a book that poorly made and easily misunderstood...

And even further, why would God be happy with you doing something at a certain time period then be upset at you and tell you not to do the exact same thing within the same context years later? Did he change his mind?

Count 3171 6598
  • 15 Oct
 DerFurst

@SIEGE said:
because ISIS conveniently ignores the "stop killing the infidels" part

It's kind of hard to know what the book wants from you if it tells you in one sentence to kill everyone because they're infidels and in the second sentence to stop killing people because that's bad.

Count 3171 6598
  • 15 Oct
 DerFurst

But Islam was written by the venerable prophet Muhammad, who was divinely inspired by Allah to write an infallible book that is true for all times...

What part of the Quran says that you're supposed to "ignore this part" if you're living in the future past the time it was written? Scholars and activists are the only ones who claim this, and they certainly aren't divinely inspired, since Muhammad was the last prophet... So why exactly can you claim this?

Count 3171 6598
  • 1
  • 15 Oct
 DerFurst

@SIEGE said:
They're not properly following Islam. You can't judge their actions as Islamic anymore.

We're Muslims, we're strict, we've got statues in Museums. Before ISIS destroyed those statues, those statues were in Muslim lands, protected and guarded by Muslims. What does that say about Islam? Why'd you only care about what ISIS did?

A "good Muslim" is one who follows Islam the wrong way. The Sufi Muslims, for example, are probably the "best Muslims" because their devotion isn't towards the religion, but towards their idea of God itself, and facilitating direct contact via compassionate actions and meditative practices. This is more like mysticism or occultism than Islam...

ISIS however is following Islam correctly as outlined in the Quran. If you read the book word for word, it'll tell you repeatedly to be deceitful to enemies, to conquer other nations by force, to utterly destroy your enemies and humiliate them in the worst ways possible, and to be harsh towards women.

Count 3171 6598
  • 1
  • 15 Oct
 DerFurst

@SIEGE said:

@DerFurst said:
Yes, Islam has brought culture to the infidels of Persia

ISIS is anti-Iran, Furst. how the fuck did you not know that

Sumeria was one of those "cradles of civilization" you know. For ISIS to destroy that history in the name of Islam just goes to show that the religion itself isn't about educating anyone, but destroying alternative viewpoints. This is only because Islam doesn't have a foot to stand on without force, as almost any other alternative is better.

Despite that, I don't hate you for believing it. You were born into it, and if it weren't for Judaism, it never would have reached you. Ultimately, Muslims are as much victims of their religions as they are perpetrators. It's sort of like an abusive father situation where the children abuse their children because it's what they've grown up believing is normal.