Mordhau
 DerFurst
Count
  • Likes received 7973
  • Date joined 26 Oct '15
  • Last seen 5h

Private Message

Count 3706 7973

that's actually pretty cool - high tech spear chucking

Count 3706 7973

@Lincs said:
Have some non-retarded examples:
woad1.jpg

What happened to the guy on the bottom? Did he trip?

Count 3706 7973

@KIWI said:

@Bodkin said:
tfw Bardiche already has slash-based polearm covered

shiiiiiiieeeeet

u rite

there's a longsword, a greatsword, and a super duper greatsword in the game right now - they're all swords, but different still. There's even going to be stabby sword soon.

I'm sure they can find room for the glaive if they want. Think: "the glaive is to the bardiche as the greatsword is to the longsword."

Count 3706 7973

dude shit you're trying so hard to get me banned lmao stop it

Count 3706 7973

If you're in poverty, stealing isn't evil

That's what Disney's Aladdin taught me

Count 3706 7973

@Huggles said:

@DerFurst said:

@Huggles said:

@Maci said:
Idk I didn't participate much but I read every single post, was fun.

Dumb rule change imo, they went from "yeah do whatever just like don't kill each other I guess lol" to your typical stale stick-in-the-butt forum rules.

Because before the community was like 10 guys, lmao. Devs are wanting to advance to beta stage and get serious about their game and how its perceived tbh.

"The ADL has declared Mordhau a 'haven for white supremacists.' One forum user by the name 'DerFurst' posted a picture with several math problems and the phrase 'there can only be one solution here,' overlayed with haunting pictures glorifying the Nazi regime. This is only one out of several hundred posts from only this user."

lmao, that basically already happened to Kingdom Come: Deliverance not just a week ago with some twitter warriors. I wouldn't be surprised tbh.

but the diff is you're actually sympathetic to nazis and a holocaust denier, tbh.

What happened in kingdom come was nowhere near this, some autistic game "journalism" website just called it racist for it not having black people in medieval bohemia. Completely different than calling you what you actually are tbh.

Now that I can't exactly fight back I suppose it's the best time for you to anklebite like crazy, so have at it, Huggles.

But towards the actual point, if something so minor and trivial was enough to trigger some liberal progressive news journalist into crying "racism," imagine what some hardcore racism could actually do. Fear was enough to keep the developers in check, and that fear carried over to these forums as brash action and overreaction. The power that these whiny journalists have to ruin reputations is extremely powerful despite coming from a position of weakness, because of how we've been taught socially to respond to accusations of things like racism and bigotry.

So yes, an overreaction it probably was, but definitely sensible.

Count 3706 7973

It's a what-if scenario you silly people

The developers were probably particularly scared at the bad press Kingdom Come: Deliverance just had in regards to being a Medieval European game without any non-European people in it, so that was probably what kicked their fear of getting bad press themselves into full gear.

Count 3706 7973

@GIRUGIRU said:
maybe you should open your mind abit, you do realize there is an entire world outside of these forums ?

https://discord.gg/V56Bv6

My experience on discord is that you and your buddies do the same stupid circlejerk there too, only more effectively since there's less people around to disagree with you.

Where did i say everybody on the forum is a degenerate ? Twisting my wording isn't a very good strategy for debate, sorry kid. Try to stay focused on the subject

Do you need a reminder?

"my henchmen" is an interesting term for competitive Chivalry players. Again, these people have years of experience in Melee Slasher the main reason why they don't post here is because of the degenerates holed up in here who have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

From experience dealing with you in the past, everyone who disagrees with you suddenly becomes one of those "degenerates who has absolutely no idea what they're talking about." Also, who are you referring to when you say "your creatures set a bad example for the game" when I don't have a particular posse? Is everyone who has agreed with me at one point one of "my creatures?" If so, then yes, the entire forum is filled with my creatures.

As for communication from the devs itself, i think this place needs abit of a clean before the devs should use it more, because atm they're having to put down people left right and center about things they've already made decisions about, and get no good for feedback for the ones they haven't

The developers were perfectly happy listening to their community here for the past two years. If they think that these forums are useless then they wouldn't bother to read them so carefully as they have, or moderate them as closely as they have.

Count 3706 7973

You talk about brigading, yet every time I show up here all your little friends appear aswell. You're lucky that you've avoided being banned for this long, any normie developer would have knocked that shit off a long time ago.

Who are these "friends" you're talking about? The people that like any of my posts are just the same regulars that hang out on the forums. I don't consistently get liked by many of the same people, and I've practically made it my mission to piss off as many people as I possibly can. No one feels obligated to defend me, ever, and they don't. People like what I have to say because they agree or find it funny, and that's it.

You, on the other hand, bring a group of people you far more personally know (you've apparently been friends in Chivalry for a long time, as you say.) You've just admitted in your very own post that you think everyone on these forums is a degenerate and that you and your friends are the only sane people around, and who are the only people the developers are worth listening. That was the worst possible way you could have refuted an accusation of brigading. How can you have been so foolish...

Count 3706 7973

There is no discussion from you or your henchmen in threads you're in, only "hahaha I'm euro pr0 man fuck your opinion like I fuked ur mom smallson, nothing is wrong you're just bad" over and over again.

You're lucky that Crush seems to think you're worthwhile, because any developer who wasn't a nepotist employing double-standards when dealing with you would have knocked that shit off a long time ago, and stopped you from brigading these forums the first time it happened.

Count 3706 7973

@Huggles said:

@Maci said:
Idk I didn't participate much but I read every single post, was fun.

Dumb rule change imo, they went from "yeah do whatever just like don't kill each other I guess lol" to your typical stale stick-in-the-butt forum rules.

Because before the community was like 10 guys, lmao. Devs are wanting to advance to beta stage and get serious about their game and how its perceived tbh.

"The ADL has declared Mordhau a 'haven for white supremacists.' One forum user by the name 'DerFurst' posted a picture with several math problems and the phrase 'there can only be one solution here,' overlayed with haunting pictures glorifying the Nazi regime. This is only one out of several hundred posts from only this user."

lmao, that basically already happened to Kingdom Come: Deliverance not just a week ago with some twitter warriors. I wouldn't be surprised tbh.

Count 3706 7973

I agree that these things would be cool, but you really used some terrible examples here...

Count 3706 7973

@GIRUGIRU said:
it pleases me sexually to be able to witness the cleansing of this god-forsaken place

soon, this place will be a viable medium for communication and not some local degenerate e-congregation

Yes, I agree.

The next rule they should add is "no brigading the forums." People shouldn't be allowed to plan attacks on threads with their friends, making dummy accounts, or activating other rarely used accounts just to mass comment based on a particular narrative and inflate the number of likes a post has in threads. People who do this are attempting to artificially control the outcomes of discussions to make it appear like one group's opinion is more popular than another, in the hope of swaying the developers to make changes (or to not) based on wishes of the brigaders. It's a dirty tactic that doesn't lead to productive discussions, and usually ends up with two sides yelling at each other fruitlessly over matters of pride and ego.

It's a wonder the developers haven't put a stop to this sort of behavior sooner. You'd think that a problem which prevents actual discussion about gameplay mechanics from being useful in the alpha of the game would be a bigger priority than banning political discussions.

Count 3706 7973
  • 24 Feb
 DerFurst

All it really comes down to is this: Crush disagrees with just about everyone's opinion in the politics thread, whether you were a fashy goy or a commie, so rather than having to constantly read things he disagrees with, he bans all discussion entirely so he doesn't have to feel uncomfortable anymore, and he gets to have fun banning people he doesn't like in the process.

He already made his political stance clear when he called me literally hitler, and how he expressed his disgust that "holocaust deniers" could even exist and how such people should be silenced completely. It's only too ironic that he uses a position of dictatorial power to silence undemocratic talk about... dictatorial power.

It's not the first time he's done this. Crush usually bans people for personal reasons but with an outward "Casus Belli" so his personal vendettas don't seem so silly. Crush banned Faffywaffy for some unfunny pedophilia meme (and while I didn't like Faffy either, people have done worse before that,) then Crush banned Ranten a while back because he stuck up for me when we were complaining about their decision to let Giru play the game early, and then he banned Sammy who was complaining about how Crush did a 180 degree stance on including Third Person in this game. Sammy claimed he did this because he wanted everyone to be forced to look at his animations - a big no-no.

He later banned Survii for nearly 12 years(!) for posting political shit immediately after Crush declared political things illegal, as in about an hour or two later. He then went back on that extreme ban for only a few weeks an hour later when he realized how stupid and extreme that was.

So yes, ultimately it comes down to how the developers personally feel. I'm not upset at this and understand it completely, but I think it's important to see the real reasons. Crush doesn't like reading political things, and this is their forum, so even though I think its wimpy to give fake reasons for doing things, I still respect that they own this place and they can do what they want with it.

Count 3706 7973
Count 3706 7973
  • 24 Feb
 DerFurst

@Humble Staff said:
Damn it i hate my spic status, i want to try this game so badly

Count 3706 7973
  • 24 Feb
 DerFurst

I shot a bandit in the head with an arrow in his sleep. He got up and beat his friend to death, then later fell over dead from the head wound

this game is hilarious

Count 3706 7973
  • 24 Feb
 DerFurst

Here is the reason why the estoc should get mordhau:

yo momma's so fat they call her "maximum capacity"

Count 3706 7973
  • 23 Feb
 DerFurst

If you want to make the realism argument, ideally this weapon would have THREE modes.

There's the normal longsword grip - since you wouldn't ALWAYS be fighting plate armored guys and would get a lot more use out of extra distance when dueling someone else with say a longsword wearing only some light padding.

There's the halfsword grip - since you might sometimes be fighting people in plate armor and would want extra precision in thrusting

Then there's the mordhau grip - since you might not have the chance to actually be precise with your stabs and you might just need to hit someone really hard with a blunt edge, such as a heavily armored knight or noble with exquisite armor revealing no good gaps to thrust into.

....

So for realism, this weapon would get THREE grips. However, having three grips in this game is completely unprecedented, and probably unnecessary gameplay wise. This would either require a new implementation allowing quick swapping between three grips, OR the easy way, which is to limit the sword to two as already discussed.

So we're not going for absolute realism here, but gameplay with a slice of realism. Since gameplay trumps realism here, we probably should keep it at two grips maximum, which means the grip that doesn't make it into the game is the one with the least gameplay impact.

Which grip is least impactful? You guessed it, the half-sword grip. We already have weapons that can halfsword, and we'd be adding a third in the estoc, so that's one reason. Second reason is because the half-sword grip doesn't have any significant gameplay differences. The swings will still be shite damage and the stabs will still be fast and good, just a little bit shorter. That's not a very impressive or meaningful change in the least bit... Why not just use the longer grip at that point?

Do you see where what I mean here? For all the reasons just described, half-swording is not the ideal weapon mode to give the estoc, either in its main grip or secondary grip. The developers are right on the money here.

Count 3706 7973
  • 23 Feb
 DerFurst

chickity china