gender studies bad cuz i seen it on the youtube

👺gib patchie 👺

@Maci said:

@TombstoneJack said:

haha its funny because stromtropper cant aim get it guys xDDDDDDD

yes

@TheDankestMeme said:

@TheKingInTheNorth said:

@TheDankestMeme said:
metal

I see you are also a man of culture.

i dont really like earrape stuff such as black metal tho, a bit too edgy for me

Same tbh, more about the classic stuff.

@TheDankestMeme said:
metal

I see you are also a man of culture.

@Humble Staff said:
The wolf in his avatar seems to be getting one in the back

Jealous of the action my avatar is getting.

@Humble Staff said:
Wouldn't that be the battle royale mode Crushed talked about in discord?

I wouldn't know as I'm not in the discord.

Is this allowed 🤔

Conceited stick.

4 smaller teams in a melee sounds like a ton of fun to be had. I approve.

I don't think any parties that have been in power in recent memory have been left wing at all. That's like saying Hitler was a socialist because his party was called the national socialist party.

My point being of course that you have to look at policy and not just how they present themselves.

@vanguard said:
Yes thats the one, read his government plan you guys are going to love it, it makes no sense! But it doesn't even matter, people like him because of the things he say, a lot of edgy teenagers that educate themselves via memes ends up voting on this dude lmao. Basically he will give full control of a huge part of south america's economy to bankers and shit and I can't wait for it, brazil doesn't have the structure to hold up against workers strikes and all that stuff, this country barely functions already

From what I've heard about him you guys are fucked. Good luck mate.

@TombstoneJack said:
https://youtu.be/w0qVciN4lTs?list=WL

I upvoted this but then I noticed he was holding a Katana.

0/10

@Huggles said:
Just let him discredit himself with his rambling tbh

Well you called it buddy, that last one was pretty cringe.

@ĶiĻăƦesrumpMcBøøgerballls said:
Please stop putting words in my mouth and defending a few hundred women in battle = SEE THEY WERE THERE, then need to be in the game, is beyond retarded.

Nice strawman fella, nobody said they NEED to be in the game. Just that it's historically justifiable.

That is like .0001% population in all battles in history were wamenz... SMDH
Adding them adds nothing to the game but distraction and will not increase sales.

You don't know that bud.

But hey live out your transgender fantasies, and I will be happy to dismember your female corps and skull fuck you.

triggered af tbh

@TheDankestMeme said:
this thread is slowly becoming more autistic than every political threads combined

Getting that nostalgic feeling tho

I'm only using words like cuck and snowflake cause that's all you red pilled cucks can understand. I wouldn't like to be caught using those words irl unironically.

@ĶiĻăƦesrumpMcBøøgerballls said:
Points of Debate:
Historical - There are maybe 100 examples of women in battle compared to the millions of men that have fought and died. Women in battle during medieval times both before and after is very very rare. So King of the Douche Nugget's wiki link is irrelevant and statistical outliers (along with all his retarded posts). Women of those time periods were not warriors. if anything they were the reasons why men fought for and to protect.

Over 100 named examples, good sir. The fact that those exist are reason alone to include women, but it also implies that there were many more unnamed ones. Just like the amount of named male examples we have is far lower than the actual amount of male fighters that have existed. I mean, there is this account from a Danish historian of a battle that had one side completely consist of women. And that's just one example. The Valkyries in Norse mythology were based on shieldmaidens, women that fought alongside vikings. Vikings are in the game. There are plenty of historical reasons to include women even if they were statistically the minority. Even if it is <1% of all warriors, they were there therefore they can be included on a historical basis.

Audio - This can break the game.... Screeching woman's battle cries and taunts are worse than listening to a teen going through puberty and his sack hasn't dropped yet, specially if they are not done well. Be honest, when a woman is yelling at you, mom, sister, girlfriend, what do you do? Tune it out if at all possible or you bend the knee to get them to shut up. Who wants that in a game?

This is completely subjective to your snowflake ears. Most people aren't triggered by hearing high pitched female noises.

Design - So if the female armor and characters are not going to be any different, then why do it? So you dont want to make them hot and sexy because that is "sexist". Lets make them ugly so they look like men so as not to be misogynistic. Cannot make woman bots to rescued or slaughtered in village massacres because you cannot present the wamenz as defenseless or helpless because they are all stunning and brave. Isnt there better things the devs could be working on considering a redesign of virtually all clothing options?

If they wear helmets you could do it for the voices, if they don't you would see a feminine face. What's hot and sexy is subjective as well. Female bots will probably be included. I mean, you can rampage all women you see in GTA V and many other games, there is no reason not to include women among the men in the bot roster.

Realism - Yes we all know the game is not a simulator nor is it all that realistic. But that is not a valid argument for adding women in combat. But the majority of things that tie the game together is the genera of European, medieval melee combat and all that includes. The game is not fantasy, there are not elves, no magic, nor dragons or wizards. Throwing women in as combat is like adding Sherman tank into the game. It simply doesnt fit.

This is just the same as the historical argument but in different words.

Sales - Chivalry: sold just fine, Deadliest Warrior: sold just find, Mirage: added woman and flopped. Ok that was funny but not a real cause and effect. But if you played all 3.... just saying... There is no proof that more copies will be sold for transgender knights and wahmenz rights.

No proof it will sell more, no proof it will sell less. Compelling argument here broski.

Game Industry - The industry was created by and mostly played by men, males for decades. While the stats try and claim that women make up 48% of all gamers, this is not true of "Tactical Shooter and Sports Game Players Are Least Likely To Be Female" where the female population is around 7%. "Match 3 and Family/Farm Sim Gamers Are Most Likely To Be Female." 69% Source: https://quanticfoundry.com/2017/01/19/female-gamers-by-genre/ This shows that women are not even going to be playing this game in any serious numbers what so ever. So why again are we catering to them (7%)?

What about men wanting to play as a female character? You're so shortsighted it's amazing. Perhaps the fact that women are under-represented in shooters is a reason many women don't play them? I don't know, neither do you. This is also the same as the historical argument. They are a minority, but they are here. So they should be included.

But games and media in general are escapism. To escape for the bullshit of the real world. Many players love the idea of becoming a knight, a fighter pilot, and many more historical based characters and the more realism the better. As women invaded the industry more PC SJW bullshit infected the industry. There are shit tons of games where they have gender fluid playable characters that fit in their genera and time periods. I would say the majority of games are exactly that. There are actually very good games where the lead character is female as well. But, It is rare now a days that game devs stick to gender norms for the historical based games. Battlefield 5, got woke and is going broke with forced diversity. There has also been a massive increase of leftist political bullshit being shoved down the throats of gamers for the last 10 years as if that is a good thing. So to see a dev group buck the trends is in many players opinions, favored.

Simply having playable female characters is not an SJW issue you absolute cuck. There is nothing political about their mere presence. BFV is going to bomb because the beta revealed much bigger issues than just the fact that women exist in it. Even historically, people were way more upset about the land battle in Rotterdam which never took place between the Brits, who were never there, and the Germans. Also complaining about realism in a game where you can jump out of a plane mid-looping, shoot an RPG at another plane, then land back in your own plane and fly away (among many more unrealistic gameplay elements which break immersion far more than muh wamen) is nothing short of retarded.

Sociological/political - Some was touched on above. But there is political influences at work through indoctrination and agendas when most all players just want to escape from that BS. I am not saying the devs are being political, I just do not see a good reason to do it. Instead, this thread has shown how smug and indoctrinated some are and how divisive it can be even when valid points are made to not include women in combat roles while at the same time insulting those who differ from the group think and assuming they do not want any females in any games ever.

You're delusional if you think the devs of this game are indoctrinated by leftist politics. The ones that I've seen share their views are pretty far to the right, my dude. It takes a lot to get banned here when it comes to anti-women, racist, nazi rhetoric and memes. You only need to read the politics threads and how long they stayed up, or look at the 'post the last thing that made you laugh' thread and see what they get away with there to affirm this. It just goes to show that even among right wingers, your opinion is a minority.

k good troll 13 pages well done

now fuck off