Mordhau
 DOESNOTCOMPUTE
Knight
  • Likes received 369
  • Date joined 13 Apr '16
  • Last seen 16h
Private Message
Knight 426 369

@Sammy said:
And where's the proof that socialism works? What country has made everyone equal and not collapsed again? Fuck off, retard.

Norway is doing pretty good

Knight 426 369

So as we all know once you run out of stamina your weapon will be knocked out of your hands on the next block, however as we've seen in the gameplay videos you are able to pick the weapon up seemingly straight away. This means that experienced players will most likely just monitor their stamina and instantly pick up their weapon after being stam drained. My question is will the player be given some stamina back straight away after dropping the weapon or will it be more like chivalry where you are unable to attack or block for a short period giving the enemy a free swing?

It's hard to tell since there's no UI but it looks like he could have picked the weapon up a bit faster to allow for a block on the next hit, and if that's the case then what prevents the enemy from spam knocking the weapon out of the other guys hands?

Knight 426 369

anarcho-communist XDDDD

Knight 426 369

Exactly Smeelio, this is why socialism doesn't work on a large scale. It's much easier to work together in a homogeneous society that consist of only a few million people.

Knight 426 369

@vanguard said:
The first argument doesn't even make sense outside of a specific Soviet Union context. I mean, what if this socialism actually improve life?

Socialism doesn't improve life unless there's a relatively high amount of wealth in the general population to start with, if you enforce socialism in a poor country like Brazil it will just keep everyone in the gutter.

Knight 426 369

@Sammy said:

@DOESNOTCOMPUTE said:
The problem with national socialism

actually the problem with socialism, and this includes all kinds of it, is that it's fucking retarded, doesn't work and never will work

ur welcome

On the top 5 countries with the highest living standard in the world 3 are socialist.

Socialism never works tho xdxdxd

Knight 426 369

@vanguard said:

@DOESNOTCOMPUTE said:

@vanguard said:
We need a huge state like the Soviet Union.

No. Socialism CAN NOT work on a large scale, there has to be a strong nationalistic element and in a large and diverse group of people this simply cannot happen.

Why?

Nationalism also isn't necessary, if you have a strong class consciousness.

Nationalism is actually pretty limited imho

Because without nationalism someone will eventually step up and say "Hey I'm very tired of this socialism shit and I want to live a good life" then form a rebellion and break off from the socialist collective (good luck trampling every rebellion in a country of 200 million) and form their own micro-state. Eventually more people will want to break away and the fall of your Brazilian socialist union will ensue.

As you probably know, history repeats itself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Soviet_Union

Knight 426 369

@DerFurst said:
The only way for you to form your own opinion on a book is for you to read it yourself. If all you're doing is listening to outside perspectives on a book and following those perspectives instead of your own, you've effectively been propagandized

I'd rather look at actions instead of reading meaningless literature, communism also looks great on paper and this is why so many college professors and scholars are very leftist.

The problem with national socialism as an ideology is that Hitler has tainted it and it will forever be associated with world war 2, I can read everything ever written about it and conclude that it's the best ideology to ever exist but it doesn't change the fact that the average person will never be convinced of it just on the basis that Hitler mass murdered innocent people.

Get rid of all the nasty parts, re brand it and then sell it to the public. This is what happened to Christianity during the 1500s and to some extent in the enlightenment period, it's also what shaped western society and morality as we know it today.

Knight 426 369

@DerFurst said:

@DOESNOTCOMPUTE said:
The best system is always somewhere in the middle, the problem with this thread is that most of the people arguing got their ideology from either the extreme left or the extreme right so it's either JEWS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING BAD or MAYBE THE SOVIET UNION WASN'T SO BAD AFTER ALL!

just read mein kampf and you'll understand why 1: the jews are historically evil and how it's so easy for them to fool people into thinking they're not and 2: national socialism does literally everything you want out of a government

I would suggest avoiding any Jewish fabricated copies, and to pick up an actual original translation. A lot of new copies of the book are cliffnoted to hell speaking ill of Hitler's every idea and lying about what he means when he says this. Certain translations omit certain parts, and also completely reword entire paragraphs to give different meanings. Find a credible translation that's not a propaganda hit-piece against him.

Just read the bible as evidence for the bible is basically the argument you are using

Knight 426 369

The best system is always somewhere in the middle, the problem with this thread is that most of the people arguing got their ideology from either the extreme left or the extreme right so it's either JEWS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING BAD or MAYBE THE SOVIET UNION WASN'T SO BAD AFTER ALL!

Knight 426 369

I think Sammy will win with his weaponized autism and faggotry

Knight 426 369

@vanguard said:
We need a huge state like the Soviet Union.

No. Socialism CAN NOT work on a large scale, there has to be a strong nationalistic element and in a large and diverse group of people this simply cannot happen.

Knight 426 369

I too want to be in the game, however i don't think I'm noteworthy enough to warrant me being in the game. Do not put me in the game.

Knight 426 369

The biggest problem is that since Brazil probably relies on large corporations to keep its economy going they'd need to give them an incentive to stay during the "baby steps" toward socialism. How do you keep slightly raising the taxes and minimum wage without having the large corporations move to another country with lower taxes and close to no minimum wage?

I think that the moment Brazil starts moving toward socialism the big companies will bail and the entire economy will crash sending Brazil into Africa level poverty.

Knight 426 369

@vanguard said:
Capitalism is failing big time in Brazil at this very moment lmao, no socialist country ever failed this bad tbh, only capitalism manages to have a crisis in every possible aspect of the society on such dimensions.

Our economy is broken, 14 million unemployed people and it tends to get worse. We need planned economy tbh, capitalists are way too retardo to command the economy. Hue le competition is gud they say, the magic invisibru hand of the market fix all

Democratic socialism when. Enough with this retardation I say, since 1800 and I don't even know, capitalism goes crisis after crisis, inequality only rises worldwide.

It's fucking dumb beyond imagination to have the profit as a end in itself.

That's why you have all the middle East people going to EU tbh, because capitalism fucked their Homeland big time. That's why we need socialism as a worldwide thing as well, so this mass migrations stop being a thing.

The problem with Brazil is that it's too big and poor for socialism. In order for socialism to work you need a massive amount of startup money or an already stable economy, what do you think would happen if the Brazilian government raised taxes for everyone to 35% and taxes for rich people to 35% + 20% and started forcing companies to pay their employees like 2-4 times more?
On top of that Brazil has a massive crime and gang problem and immoral poor people is the last thing a socialistic country can have.

Socialism never EVER works on a large scale.

Knight 426 369

@DerFurst said:

@DOESNOTCOMPUTE said:
Because you don't need a dictator or fascism to have nationalistic socialism

...it worked great in all of Scandinavia until some globalist scum managed to get voted in and destroyed the welfare system by importing useless people who leach tax money.

Maybe you do need a dictatorship then

Corruption is unavoidable, some dictators will be cruel and unjust, some governments will. The difference is that the mean government has to leave after a 4 year period where as the dictator stays until he dies or someone kills him.

The best we can do is to lay the groundwork for a functioning society and repair it every time someone comes along and fucks it up.

Knight 426 369

@Sammy said:
doesnotcompute you are dumb and

e56b0813dcebad9bf2b0ffd22922fbb2

That picture isn't even accurate tho, yes socialism has failed time and time again but it worked great in all of Scandinavia until some globalist scum managed to get voted in and destroyed the welfare system by importing useless people who leach tax money.

The same gif would work with capitalism except when capitalism fails it's not just the economy of one country that fails but the economy of the entire continent

Knight 426 369

Because you don't need a dictator or fascism to have nationalistic socialism

Would be more like nationalistic socialistic democracy, you wouldn't call Sweden from the 70s to 90s/early 2000s a nazi country would you?

Knight 426 369

The only way socialism (or any income equality based economic system) could work is with a very nationalistic people that work toward the greater good of their country, this is why socialism worked in Scandinavia up until recently when our government decided to import a bunch of sand people worshiping a god who wants them to destroy the western world.

(and no this is not national socialism)

Knight 426 369

@ChuckJones said:
Cute.

google search the image