Mordhau
 TheCEOofracisme
  • Likes received 2
  • Date joined 22 Oct '19
  • Last seen 24 Apr

Private Message

6 2

@recurf said:
In 3rd person you can run around the pillar and still see your opponent, you can also perform literally instant attacks at the perfect angle. It is just stupid

nothing stops you from preforming "instant attacks at the perfect angle" in first person your just being butthurt and you know how you counter someone runing around the pillars? you just take a defensive stanse and hold back let them run around the pillar you dont have limited time

6 2

Many people have bult their entire play style around third person i personally have not played first person since i started the game and this change has basicly killed ranked for me. there is absolutly no reason to ban it honestly it does not give and "advantage" some people just like playing in third person over first person. People are going to whine no matter what they are going to whine about every little thing they can use as excuses to why they lost or died or whatever. but removing third person completly is just stupid now ranked is basicly restricted only to those who use first person. using third person or first person is a choice its about what you prefer playing third person gives no advantages over first person.

6 2

Currently the balista on mountain peak is extremly hard to reach leading it to be possibly the best ballista in the entire gamer. this is made worse due to the fact that blue cant acctualy flank it or go to it because its in spawn protected area. this means that the only way to bring it down is to somehow dodge the ballista while after you climb the ladder next to the left tower and getting close enough to throw a firebomb. this works against the ballista but archers are still basicly invincible there unless someone is able to land a headshot on one of them. Basicly blue should be able to use the wall to attack archers and ballista on in close querters if they manage to flank.

6 2

i have played quite alot of duels lately and kicks have become as reacuring problem for me. usaly when kicks do get annoying is for example when im fighting someone for a periode of time both our health is low and they just wasted their entire stamina bar feinting. i swing about to land the final blow when they suddendly kicks. my sword does not have the time to land and i die. wasting stamina and health should be punished there should be punished. you should not be able to have an easy way out in every situation and with the enclusion of the damage boost when wearing havy armore kicks do unrealistic amounts of damage. kicks should not be a viable option when a sword is swinging at your face it should be an attack you draw unexpectingly out to do small amounts of damage to an opponent and knock them back it should not be used as a viable offensive attack in a sword fight or a way out when you wasted your health and stamina. of course this is just my oppinion

6 2

i have been playing lots of duels lately and have noticed how much feints are being used. people often spam feints while violently shaking their camera in an attempt to look like they are about to hit. of course this takes quite a toll on their stamina wich would lead to them losing their weapon therefore punishing them for such a reckles strategy. but no it does not with one easy kick their stamina goes right back up leading to their survival. in general i belive that kicks should not regenerate stamina on hit and have feinting cost more stamina to punish people for playing recklesly and wasting it. there should be no easy way out of wasting your entire stamina bar on spamming Q.