Mordhau
 CazzyVR
  • Likes received 55
  • Date joined 15 Jun '19
  • Last seen 16h

Private Message

147 55
  • 24 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Lenin said:

@CazzyVR said:
So please don't speak for everyone and don't insult me, you can't even insult a piece of bread.

Try coming at me with less Anger and people might actually listen to you too.

OMFG, where the fuck did i even insult you? And btw im not angry. Im just getting started, this is me being calm.

This is you calm? I find that hard tp believe. So again are you gonna be civil and talk like a Adult or are you gonna keep being Ignorant and not actually attacking our Points. Like I said with the Immersion, it's a stupid Argument as everyone has their View on what's Immersive. But in my Opinion if Female Knights are the Deal Breaker for you, you have weird Immersion Standings.

Like I will now annoy you with Female Boob Plate Armor Word Wall:

It is possible for when Female Knights are added that Female Boob Plate would be Realistic as back in the Medieval Era they would often Accentuate the Armor to Enhance the Form. One good example is the Roman "Muscle Curiass", it offer's no real benefit to the armor but is there Primarily for aesthetics. The Knight's Armor sometimes had Shlong Armor that was done to make it appear bigger, it in no way helps the Wearer, in fact it even makes it so they can't even Ride a Horse, but was done enough and was so Common we have many examples. So if we use our Current Knowledge of the Medieval Era we can safely assume if Female Knights were Common it is not hard to think that Boob Plate Armor would have come about. It would actually be beneficial too as Plate Armor has a Natural Curve that can Reflect and Deflect Attacks to the Chest. Also when fighting a Plate Armored Knight I'm not swinging for the Chest as that is completely encased in Hardened Steel. I would go for the Gaps in the Armor or try to knock them down and Grapple them to stab in the eyes or again in the exposed areas. So yes, it is theoretically possible Boob Plate Armor would have been a thing had Female Knights been more common.

147 55
  • 24 Jan
 CazzyVR

@esturias said:

@Lenin said:
OMG are you really this fucking slow in the brain? I was talking about PERCEPTION you moron.

You can call it whatever you want, PERCEPTION, OPINION or SUBJECTIVE whatever. It doesn't change the fact that it doesn't make much sense. That's all that people stated here. Of course you are still free to stick to that standpoint, so no need to act like an idiot here.
You could actually try to replace those pointless insults with some arguments. Or answer comments instead of just repeating the same nonsense over and over.
I'm sorry to tell you, but right now, you are the only moron here. (Ok... and Ohshitsorry, but he doesn't count.)

Think with your fucking head before typing stupid shit.

That's why I love irony.

I love this guy. Honestly I have never seen such Ignorance and stupidity in one man before and he is a Gem to read his stupidity

147 55
  • 24 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Lenin said:

@CazzyVR said:

Also don't get so heated dude. I'm the type who likes to Educate people Nicely and if I taught someone something they didn't already know then I did my job. Have fun dude. Can't wait for the thread of yours complaining about Woman being added.

OMFG again the fucking arrogance. Who the fuck do think you are, you could educate me? You dont fucking educate anyone you are just annoying as fuck with your fucking text walls, that nobody fucking cares about.

See... didn't bother to quote anything else. Not gonna attack the points I made either? Also pelase don't act like you speak for everyone here. I'm not the only one making "Word Walls". Plus reason they get so long is I quote it in it's entirety so there is absolutely no Confusion or Arguments of "Taken out of Context/Never said that". Anyways I know you don't care about it but I do. So please don't speak for everyone and don't insult me, you can't even insult a piece of bread.

Try coming at me with less Anger and people might actually listen to you too.

147 55
  • 1
  • 24 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Quenquentthebabysitter said:

@Galaxy said:
Honest opinion: Do people really want women in a game like this? It's extremely violent. My fear is that it would promote violence against women unintentionally.

Good to know it doesn't or won't promote violence against men

@MachinePlayer said:
I believe female warriors are more akin to Scottish and Scandinavian cultures. The only female medieval knight I can think of is Joan of arc. I think the addition of shieldmaidens would be cool but implementing and immersion are valid criticisms, crying incel isn't.

Considering how we got Vikings and pseudo-Romans fighting Knights, saying there's Scottish/Scandinavian culture traits in Mordhau doesn't feel far off. I also wouldn't be surprised if one of the possible female voices is an overly Scottish one.

I'm also on board with the "Ruining immersion is a bad argument" train. As long as we don't have ridiculous stuff like boob armor or overly hourglass-shaped women, immersion shouldn't take too much of a hit. I'm sure this would never have been an argument if women were in the game from the start. I mean, look at For Honor : you got female version, or even female-exclusive characters, without destroying the game's immersion. But I have to agree For Honor's immersion is rather wide compared to Mordhau's.

@Lenin said:
LOL the fucking arrogance and audacity of people like you, PISSES me of the crack. People have different perceptions. For me and others it would ruin immersion. For you not? OK fine, but dont fucking tell me how i have to enjoy my game. Seriously what the fuck is wrong with you?
And you really have a very fucking hard time understanding the difference between gameplay mechanics/balance and atmosphere/immersion. Every game is unrealistic since its a game you fucking genius, this has nothing to with how I perceive it or immerse myself in it.

I wouldn't be surprised if there was a vote on if women should be added to Mordhau, the majority will vote yes or not care. I also doubt fighting someone else in full armor and with a female voice would ruin the immersion. Yes, we all have our array of what we consider immersive or not, but if other's immersion aren't troubled by women in Mordhau, then I don't see why yours should be prioritized.

Also, protip : it's much easier to push your points toward others if you don't put "fuck" every two sentences.

Actually it is possible Female Boob Armor would have been a thing if Female Knights were more Common. See, back then the Knights would often times get Cod Piece Armor, or as I prefer to call it "Shlong Armor" to Accentuate their Shlong Size. In fact King Henry the 8th's Armor had one such Piece (Picture will be linked) so it is possible Female "Boob Plate Armor" would have been a thing as they often did make the Armor to accentuate the Body's Forms. Also it is as protective as Normal plate armor and in fact very viable. I will also link the 2 videos on the Subject.

Shadiversity - Female Armor: Fantasy Versus Reality

Shadiversity - Is "Female Boob Plate" Armor Dangerous or Possible?

King Henry the 8th's Armor and just look at that Shlong Armor!

dwadaw.jpg

147 55
  • 24 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Lenin said:

@CazzyVR said:
People like this Piss me off Crack. "Oh Women would break the game's Realism and Immersion"... Realism? The fact a Naked Man can survive a Full Force Hit from a Longsword and still move like he doesn't have a 2 Foot Long, Rib Exposing Slash across the chest IS Unrealistic. This Game is not Realistic.

If that were the Case Full T3 wouldn't be able to be killed without using most Blunt or 2 Handed Weapons like the BillHook, Halberd, Maul, Mace ETC ETC. Longsword users would have tp use the Mordhau/Murder Stroke (Gripping the Blade and using the Guard and Pommel as a Improvised Blunt Object) in order to actually damage Opponents.

LOL the fucking arrogance and audacity of people like you, PISSES me of the crack. People have different perceptions. For me and others it would ruin immersion. For you not? OK fine, but dont fucking tell me how i have to enjoy my game. Seriously what the fuck is wrong with you?
And you really have a very fucking hard time understanding the difference between gameplay mechanics/balance and atmosphere/immersion. Every game is unrealistic since its a game you fucking genius, this has nothing to with how I perceive it or immerse myself in it.

Someone else already corrected you but since you commented on me and didn't quote the stuff that I said properly let me correct you as well.

-I never stated that you need to enjoy the game a certain way. You think that adding woman Models is the "Immersion Breaker" fine. as many have pointed out in this Thread and many others that immersion is the stupidest Argument you can use here as the game isn't realistic or Immersive at 95% of the time.

-I do actually understand the Difference between Gameplay and Immersion. I'm sorry you don't. Yes every game is Unrealistic, doesn't mean I can use it as a jumping point for the Real World variation of it. Yes you can view the Game however you want but also aI'm allowed to talk about the Real World Variations.

Also don't get so heated dude. I'm the type who likes to Educate people Nicely and if I taught someone something they didn't already know then I did my job. Have fun dude. Can't wait for the thread of yours complaining about Woman being added.

147 55
  • 1
  • 23 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Cracksmith said:

@ButcherGER said:
Political correctness is a damn cancer.

This has literally nothing to do with politics, its about a feature that was promised from the get go that hasnt been added to the game yet. Get that stick out of your ass.

People like this Piss me off Crack. "Oh Women would break the game's Realism and Immersion"... Realism? The fact a Naked Man can survive a Full Force Hit from a Longsword and still move like he doesn't have a 2 Foot Long, Rib Exposing Slash across the chest IS Unrealistic. This Game is not Realistic.

If that were the Case Full T3 wouldn't be able to be killed without using most Blunt or 2 Handed Weapons like the BillHook, Halberd, Maul, Mace ETC ETC. Longsword users would have tp use the Mordhau/Murder Stroke (Gripping the Blade and using the Guard and Pommel as a Improvised Blunt Object) in order to actually damage Opponents.

Chain mail would protect the User very well and would be considered Very Protective to most One Handed Weapons.

Ghambeson (Padded Armor) would be Very Protective as Properly Made Gambeson is seriously protective against Slashes.

People wouldn't go into combat with a Frying Pan, Training Swords or Naked.

Basically adding Females isn't because of Political Correctness. If that were the case, ANY game with a Playable female Character is only doing it for Political Correctness. That means Tomb Raider, Any Elder Scrolls Games, Any Fallout Games, Cyberpunk 2077, Blackwake, Skull and Bones, Mass Effect Series (including Andromeda), Mount And Blade Warband. Why? Well if adding Females is only done for Political Correctness for Mordhau then I can assume you use the Logic for every other game as well.

As to the Topic, Games like Mount And Blade Warband actually do the Female Character somewhat Justice. When you create a Female Character it actually states the Game will be harder for you because Females weren't Commonly Knights or Soldiers back then, thus people might not pay you as much, people night not respect you as much, etc etc. That is realistic.

We also know there were limited and Rare Cases of Female Knights and Fighters int he Medieval Era. They were the Incredibly Rare Exception and not the Norm however. In Fact (I will link a Video explaining Medieval Plate Armor for Women) Proper Medieval Plate Armor could have been easily Worn by a Female.

Please check these Videos out as they are insightful and can help educate and even show my favorite part of Medieval Plate Armor... SHLONG ARMOR (Cod Pieces)!!!

Shadiversity - Female Armor: Fantasy Versus Reality

Shadiversity - Is Female "Boob Plate" Armor Dangerous?

Also need I remind people Female Player Models were promised and they even have Rough Models. Hell you can go into the Game's Files and force the Game to show a Female Player Model (doesn't include the Head). Hell, look at this from the Devs!

147 55
  • 23 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Shitscrubber64 said:
Threads like these remind me that even on these forums, 90% of players don't even know how to chamber or utilize basic footwork.

Maybe not everyone is as good at the game as you? I'm Level 23, primarily use the Longsword, Crossbow and Heavy Handaxe. When I chamber it's completely unintentional and I at no point intended to Chamber. I am good with Footwork, I just hate the Barbarian Tactic, aka "Charge the Enemy with you're Zwiel or Maul while naked and just wildely Swing and pray you hit something.

147 55
  • 21 Jan
 CazzyVR

I'm wondering wehre the Witcher Cosplays are

147 55
  • 21 Jan
 CazzyVR

@✵ Legate Lanius ✵ said:

@CazzyVR said:

@Lionheart Chevalier said:
5htk for both chainmail and heavy armor.

20 damage against T3

21 damage against T2

Those figures are way too high but whatever, compromise or some bullshit.

Something else they could do is make "Underwear Warriors" gt Insta-killed from most weapons. Let's face it, even a basic Longsword across your Bare Chest isn't something your gonna walk away from.

Honestly it has always bugged me to need to hit a guy at least twice on a naked chest (especially with stabs), then again some damage numbers aren’t based on realism or exactly hyper balanced

True... still one of those WTF Things in Mordhau. Plus can think of it from a Gameplay Perspective. You Trade what can be a Very Instant Death to the fastest Mobility

147 55
  • 20 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Lionheart Chevalier said:
5htk for both chainmail and heavy armor.

20 damage against T3

21 damage against T2

Those figures are way too high but whatever, compromise or some bullshit.

Something else they could do is make "Underwear Warriors" gt Insta-killed from most weapons. Let's face it, even a basic Longsword across your Bare Chest isn't something your gonna walk away from.

147 55
  • 1
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Humble Staff said:
People has stated a bazillion times in many threads and across multiple threads too why held blocks in the way they were implemented were so toxic for the game. This thread included. Maybe they could have let held blocks stay if they tried making it more locational based.
Then all the arguments of these people would make sense.
"I should be able to hold the shield in front of me, it's literally what's designed for"
"It makes people have to find a different tactical approach to fight shields"
"It adds diversity and depth to the game"
"It's skillfull in a different manner"

But as they were, they shat on most of the game core mechanics, simple as that, the long answers are everywhere to be found. And many of us are not saying "HELD BLOCK IS ABSOLUTE SATAN TALK AND SHOULD BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE FACE OF THIS WORLD". We are saying that (again) they were bad for the game in the way they were implemented.
¿Why can't martial artists that are vocal about it in these forums can't understand the difference in between game design and real world fighting? Just like real fighting and stage/movie fighting can't be the same for other reasons. In both cases you can try to find a middle ground, where both things are sort of accomplished, but if you have to let one overtake the other, the media where the fighting is being portrayed has to win to some extent, otherwise it becomes a bad example of said media.
By the way you are not helping your case by behaving like this, no amount of training in any martial art will give validity to your arguments if they are not presented in a way that makes sense and contributes to the game. You come off as arrogant and insufferably condescending by trying to educate us in a topic you don't even know how much any of us know about, while also being seemingly ignorant yourself in game balance/game design, which is why we are in a videogame forum in the first place (and not a real life fighting simulation by the way).

Well I respect your Opinion and I thank you for Attacking the Point and not the Person behind this Humble Robo Neko.

I understand Gameplay Limitations have to exist for Gameplay reasons. I have never denied that. All I have stated is that I think it was a Bad Idea as it removes the Defensive Playstyle and defeats the purpose of a Shield. I gained that Opinion by using Logic and my own Real Life Personal Training and Experience using a Shield and a IRL Bastard Sword (not my Preferred Combination but my Options are sometimes limited when you have a Blade Malfunction). I do apprecate your Insight. Again, I do not say it's Historically Accurate Game, in fact I say this is quite Far from Historically Accurate Game. I understand Gameplay Functions need to be changed to make things Balanced. As I stated ina Earleir post (that I feel started this all):

I get the feeling the Shield Patch is quite Controversial.
I personally think it was a Mistake. I preferred a Held Block as that was how they are used. Realistically and Logically. Why would I only brink my Shield up when a Opponent is attacking? Defensive Stance anyone?
I do personally think those in favor of the Shield Patch were the ones mad they couldn't beat a Shield Player. So instead of finding a better Strategy or "Getting Good" they kept complaining till the Devs had to make them happy.
I guess I'll work with what I got now. A Shields Main Purpose has been removed so now we must find alternatives. "Shield Players were bad cause they didn't have to read Accels or Drags"... so? Made it easier for them. You just got mad cause your usual tricks weren't gonna get you a Easy Kill.
Anyways that's the Cazzy opinion. Over and Out.

I hope we understand eachother that we both agree Gameplay Restrictions need to be done for Balancing, I just think it wasn't a Necessary Removal and Realistically doesn't make sense.

P.S. Do understand sometimes I will poke fun and Deliberately Trigger members of the Forum cause frankly some of you people on here (you know who you are) are quite easy to Offend/Trigger. To be fair, take some of the Insults and Jabs I throw at Half-Hearted attempts to deliberately piss you off in attempts for good Meme/Laughter Material for my Discord.

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Cracksmith said:
Tummy > Ass > Boobs > Thighs

My taste is weirder than yours, therefore better.

How about this... ANIME EYE SLIDER!

Top that.

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Cracksmith said:
I think they're all the same guy.

Nah... no way... has to be a Ritual or something

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@SWSeriousMike said:

@CazzyVR said:
I'm sorry that using Real World Tactics, Training and Logic makes me "Misinformed".

You shouldn't write this ironically. You really should be sorry about that. Your HEMA training is all for naught when game design is discussed. Imagine surgeons coming here and telling us that the medic pack is inadequate and telling us about the 100 steps necessary to dress up wounds, which still would require recovery. Or carpenters telling us that just hammering the air doesn't build a barricade or ballista.

The whole argumentation from realism is plain ridiculous. That has been pointed out so many times that you have no excuse.

So, because it's a Game I can't discuss the Real World Techiques? That I can't be pissed a Real World Tactic and a Legit Gameplay Tactic got removed? Alright...

So if it's "Just a Game Bruh" then let's get Women in the next patch! Let's add Blacks too! You know what? Fuck it! Fully Automatic AR-15s and AK-47 Nuclear Warhead Launchers.

What I'm saying is I have used these stuff in Real Life and was using it as a Exampel for what this Game should have done.

As stated before... again, I love how you guys are quick to ignore Realism when it's anything you like. But if it's Women or Black Player Models, Held Defense Shields, Proper Armor protection... all of a sudden "BuT mAh ReAlIsM"! Have you not thought that's fuckign Ironic about this Community? That Realism only counts when they want it too?

I'm sorry that my Comment offended BOTH of you. I'm sorry that my Comment using Real World Knowledge and Training offended you to the point where you couldn't even argue my Points. You use Ad Hominems and Metaphors instead of actually attacking my Points and Statements... both of you. You know what that tells me? That tells me you have nothing to counter-act it. But I'll be nice. If you can provide enough of a Logical Reason as to why a Held Defensive Stance with a Shield is such a Game Breaking and Illogical Thing both In-Game and Real Life... I will delete my Comment and announce you as correct... go ahead. Without attacking me personally... attack my points... I fucking dare you both... you won't succeed. Why? because I will of course by Fair Rights be allowed to Refute and Attack your Points too.

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@LaughingRaven said:
Spearman Skirmisher
2020-01-19 00_36_26-MORDHAU.png

Crossbow Sniper
2020-01-19 00_36_40-MORDHAU.png

Until I get a Plague Doctor mask this will have to do as my medic
2020-01-19 00_36_56-MORDHAU.png

Some mad hollow
2020-01-19 00_35_48-MORDHAU.png

Finally a good fucking medic

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@Zen said:
they should take out the feature where characters say stuff randomly

Meh. Maybe just take out Taunts and add random Battle Chatter done as Ambience. Maybe, I'm unsure.

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@LaughingRaven said:

@GhostHippie said:
If they do add female models they better add them boob sliders and jiggle physics

No ass slider?
Pleb taste.

No... Thigh Slider... we all know it's not the ass we want... it's the Dummy Thicc Thighs.

But in all seriousness, it's possible they can be added. I just think the Devs have more pressing issues on hand... like a steadily dying game.

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@LaughingRaven said:

@SWSeriousMike said:
I fall to down to other people's level where they have more experience

@Lionheart Chevalier
I am THE shield main.

What are devs going to do to facilitate defensive styled players then? I may be new, but the way I see it, what happened here is an outright removal of a playstyle. While it may not be mine (as I'm more of the rogue type) what's to stop people from begging to take out sneakthiefs next? What's to stop people from removing all the ranged next? Stuff like this screams "slippery slope" that should be avoided at all costs.

That's what I am saying! They literally removed the Defensive Playstyle because a Small Group didn't like that others "Didn't have to Read Drags or Accels". I have been trained in HEMA Swordsmanship, Historical European martial Arts for those Uninformed. When we were taught Shield Use, what was the very first thing they taught us? A Held Defensive Stance! Literally the Basic as you can fucking get for a Shield! Hold a Defensive Stance Blocking all Incoming Attacks, using the Shield to hide your Body Movements (to not give away what you are gonna do), and attack when the Enemy has made a Mistake or is wearing out. That is literally the most basic Tactic and Training with a Shield. That is as Basic as they come, Rule Fucking 1 in the Rulebook. Why would I even drop the Shield at all? I'm exposing my Body to attack! If I am in Active Combat and I am facing an Opponent, we are taught to keep the Shield up and in a Defensive Stance to protect ourselves, and to mask our Body Movements. They even tell you dropping your Guard, Dropping your Shield is a Stupid Idea as you expose yourself to attack and reveal your Motives and Movements.

They removed the Defensive Playstyle! There is no arguing it. Those who are for this are clearly unable to realize how Shields are supposed to work.

If anything this is the one thing they broke and needs to be fixed.

As you said, what if Stealth Styles are Removed next? What if all Ranged Weapons are Removed Next? What if all 1 Handed Weapons are Removed next?

If they are willing to mess up one of the most Basic Medieval Fighting Tactics then I have no doubt they are willing to remove many, many more.

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@esturias said:

@CazzyVR said:
I do personally think those in favor of the Shield Patch were the ones mad they couldn't beat a Shield Player. So instead of finding a better Strategy or "Getting Good" they kept complaining till the Devs had to make them happy.

I personally think that you should read a bit more before posting, because that got discussed over multiple pages in several threads already and it's quite annoying when people repeat the same uninformed nonsense again and again.

What many people also don't seem to understand is that there can be quite a big difference between "being in favor of something" and "liking something".
In other words, many people were glad about a change in this direction, but don't necessarily like the outcome or the resulting compromise.

I am terribly Sorry that I stated a Opinion that I don't like a Certain Update due to my personal Beliefs, Common Sense and how Shields are actually used in the Real World. Shall I commit Self Forever Sleep for daring to be "Uninformed" in the midst of you, God of Knowledge who clearly has HEMA Training and has used Shields IRL and is Trained in their use even with Full Plate Armor unlike this lowly Peasant?

Seriously dude? Misinformed? Go back to your Vape Pen. I'm sorry that using Real World Tactics, Training and Logic makes me "Misinformed".

147 55
  • 19 Jan
 CazzyVR

@PC_Principal said:
34 -> 32

If anything, nerf it's damage vs heavy (&medium?) armor body & legs. Head might do 34 that's fine.
Have you tried playing a cleaver and fighting people with spears, mauls and zwei? You guys seem to completely neglect the range drawback. I think there are at least 5 other weapons deserving of a nerf:
1) Maul
2) Messer
3) War Axe
4) Frying pan (yes..)
5) Rapier (+0.25 s windup or release pls)

See, most Cleaver users I meet are in Light or No Armor and even if you Parry or Strike first they usually use the Beserker Tactic of just Charging at you while Madly Swinging with no care for who's around them. But I agree... Damage needs to be nerfed to T2-T3. Many Underestimate Chainmail and I honestly can say without any hint of Doubt a Simple Cleaver would not be able to punch through or even Scratch Chainmail Armor. Of coruse has to do some Damage so maybe drastically reduced for T3 and Heavily Reduced for T2