@ExecuDoge said:
Came back to Mordhau for the patch after a month of not playing because of this issue, very sad to see it's still not been fixed. Very game ruining and frustration inducing bug.

Is there any update on this being fixed?

they can't even fix the server browser being janky or the random packet loss bug (look at scoreboard of any game and watch as pings randomly go red)

i think it'll be a while before they even begin to get a grasp on this one, if at all

@TheDankestMeme said:
but then i could say that straight sex will still be more prevalent because people like choice and having the choice of drilling from both sides is nice (also you dont have to touch poo), and also because them tiddy n booty are nice, to me at least your argument isnt any more convincing than the trash i just said

you can also drill men from both sides and most hygienic sexually active gay men have a douching device in their shower to clean that cavity. also i feel like ur misrepresenting my arguments. my arguments stem more from empathy, which is what good sex is all about.

i think it will increase too but again not to the extent you described

it might not, but the aforementioned deduction tells me that it will be a majority. men love cummin' and jack off a ton thanks to the internet. other males are more readily available because they're already in pre-existing social circles.

i honestly dont know what to answer to this since i didnt see those people long enough to know if they did a transition, but having a (i think) very light case of what you describe as gender dysphoria i feel that its almost as if you were trying to put them aside as not filling the homosexual box just so your hypothesis can make more sense

oh they're definitely homosexual — i just believe they find more comfort in filling woman roles, which extends to who they hang out with.

and i belive the contrary, and as i said before i think none of us has evidences that are strong enough to own eachothers libtard argument

the debate is ongoing but for the sake of the argument i'll cast this astray because of how insanely complicated it'll get lol (but i do strongly believe in nurture outweighing nature. we've broken our DNA conditioning in a myriad of ways, why wouldn't we break the sexual part?)

i wouldnt call that human sex then but rather vertebrate/arthropod sex then, but maybe this was all an etymologycal problem for me since the beginning i dunno, whatever

well my point is that we're only abstracting sexuality as far as empathy can take it, and all of our weird ass fantasies still stem from human sexuality

@TheDankestMeme said:
statistically if there is as much chances for people to be gay or straight it will have a tendency to go at around 50%

strongly disagree for the variety of aforementioned reasons, especially the car mechanic simile. males can empathize more with the male orgasm

because you are seeing things that i simply dont see, males having a tendency to hang out together and being gay is unrelated, i mean in fact the gay men i knew are the ones who were hanging out with girls the most

that's a large reason why homosexual relationships occur! the WORD homosexual stems from the greek word "homos" which means "same". men hang out with men cause they synchronize more. this will spread to sexuality once sexuality becomes more fluid.

feminine gays is a whole other weird world of arguments that even i don't really understand. my (extremely controversial) theory is those kind of gays have the beginnings of gender dysphoria, or a very mild case of it. most gays i know that acted like that actually transitioned. that being said, i don't know shit about transgenderism lol

i'm talking about genetic not your fetish, also yes your sexual orientation can change througt time but i believe this tendency can also be obsezrved throught genes

well, like i said before, i believe experiences outweigh DNA programming. you're slowly programmed to function in society as u grow up. otherwise we'd all be raping each other like cavemen did. lol

dicks or holes or maybe both at same time i dunno, you know some flies even have morningstar-shaped dicks so i get there is a large range of different shapes you can call sexual organs

ya but they're all things humans empathize with. what if there was just like. a weird patch of hair and if u brushed the hair that's sex to them. that would suck, right? cause it's nothing like the human orgasm, which is what ur empathizing with

he want da ribbed pipe. some extra ribs on dat dish naw meen

@ToLazy4Name said:
what the fuck are you doing dankest holy shit

what are u doing u fat fuckin gay ogre. go suck shreks dick

@TheDankestMeme said:
and i dont think it will be enough to totally shift the tendency from like 80% straight to 80% gay, i still think it wont go past 50% in the near or far-but-not-that-far-meaning-far-but-not-far-enough-to-genders-to-be-totally-outdated

whys that. i've explained my reasoning but u haven't really explained urs

no its not, what i mean is that unless you actively select people to be gay or bi then i dont see sexuality suddenly changing its course (over time it would make sense for it to either go full bi or 50/50), also the fact of it becoming the norm isnt garanteed yet

again, i've explained why pretty thoroughly i think the tides are going to shift but you haven't really refuted any of it other than going "i don't see it" a bunch

i dont think either you or i can accurately speak on that subject, at least not to a satisfactory degree so i think we should leave it at there

from my experiences i can pretty accurately speak on it. i went straight to bi to gay. i've also seen it happen to many straight men. in fact it's actually a fetish to turn straight men gay in homosexual culture

sexuality abstraction always stems back into regular human sexuality though. robots have dicks BECAUSE humans have dicks. insectoids probably have real fucked up disgusting looking stumpy dicks

not necesseraly

but you probably imagine them with more appealing human dicks, right?

gay normie

regardless, they don't have a third invented random reproductive organ. they're dicks. they orgasm then shoot cum no matter what they look like. ur empathizing with the male orgasm.

@TheDankestMeme said:
i too prefered to hang out with men it doesnt mean i wanted to fuck them

that's not at all what i'm saying — i'm saying a mans personality synchronizes the most with other men and therefore romantic relationships will bloom more often in the future

except that its not just about culture, more people are probably naturally straight its just genetics, in the same manner that populars things are popular (for an exemple, people liking broccolis more than french fries is rare, people being at one end of the bell curve or the other is rare aswell) i think we have more chances of being straight than gay,

this is just the "it's not natural" argument which will be completely void once gene editing becomes the norm. also i think personality & past experiences actually outweigh genetics (and past experiences are obviously going to shift in the future)

a total control of evolution would mean no natural birth and total fetus engineering

yah? that's what gene editing/cloning is. we're doing that shit already with monkeys. lol

i want to put my pp in squids, robots and sentient insectoid species so those views just mean that you are a lame normie

sexuality abstraction always stems back into regular human sexuality though. robots have dicks BECAUSE humans have dicks. insectoids probably have real fucked up disgusting looking stumpy dicks, but you probably imagine them with more appealing human dicks, right? it's all linked together

@TheDankestMeme said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:

@TheDankestMeme said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:
but i do believe a majority of men will like dicks (even if they're cartoon dicks)

well i dont like da pussy that much because i think it looks like the inside of a mussel but to me this is highly improbable

i think it's highly probable because i believe sexuality is not set in stone and ultimately is a culmination of past experience + personality. also the argument i had with mike about this earlier in the thread was pretty decent for an internet forum debate so i recommend reading that shit for an existential crisis

well yes but id still go with the assumption that the most probable outcome would be around 50% of intercourses being either gay or straight, also i wont read your shit because i'm lazy

and i'm too lazy to have the exact same argument but worse lol

ultimately it just came down to: if traditional reproduction is antiquated w/ cloning/gene editing, and men prefer to hang out with other men + society continues to destigmatize homosexuality — more men will choose other men as sexual partners to the point where it will become the norm. it'll be a snowball effect because more and more things will cater to homosexual culture like they currently do with straight culture, which will make more ppl consider being gay etc etc. the argument against it is that it's not natural, but as humans we're determining our own evolutionary paths anyway. nothing we do is natural anymore lol

also it'll be way more convenient to be gay once it's completely destigmatized. men know what makes a dick feel good, know what i mean? we jerk off all the time. women have to guess (and u have to guess to pleasure them too). it's like being a car mechanic and choosing to do computer coding. like you can sort of understand whats going on if u read up/experience things enough, but at the end of the day you know how a car works the most. humans always do whats most convenient

@TheDankestMeme said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:
but i do believe a majority of men will like dicks (even if they're cartoon dicks)

well i dont like da pussy that much because i think it looks like the inside of a mussel but to me this is highly improbable

i think it's highly probable because i believe sexuality is not set in stone and ultimately is a culmination of past experience + personality. also the argument i had with mike about this earlier in the thread was pretty decent for an internet forum debate so i recommend reading that shit for an existential crisis

@TheDankestMeme said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:
guarantee like 70% of the ppl here have jacked off to dickgirls

which is the reason why in the future no one will be gay, everyone will be too busy fucking loli anime futa sexbots to care about other human beings anymore, and i dont think any sane person will complain about that.

i don't think it'll even be called gay any more to like penis when u have a penis. it's going to get so fuckin abstract that sexuality will be so huge of a spectrum that we can't even label it all anymore lol

but i do believe a majority of men will like dicks (even if they're cartoon dicks)

@Maci said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:

@ToLazy4Name said:
why kiwi

cause you're gay

using gay as insult... bigot...

i've clearly established this is a thread for gays, so posting in it made him gay. and ur gay now too. ha ha. gay bitch

@DerFurst said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:

imagine being so low IQ that instead of considering all those kinds of theories bad, you just think the ones that originate from an opposing political philosophy is bad

imagine being so stupid that you think it's impossible for a conspiracy to exist

ugh. ofc conspiracies exist — they get outed by hard evidence. i'm glad there's a clear distinction between schizo-ing out about a pizza on a music video and actual corrupt pedo shit like epstein now, for instance

They Would Catch A Lot Of Shit For It, Is The Thing. chick fil-a is still trying to apologize. lol

since you didn't get what I meant, imagine if anti-homosexuality were the prevailing view of major tech and media organizations, and sanctioned by the government, despite homosexuality being a popular position among regular people. I'm certain you'd be a free speech advocate then.

wtf makes u think i'm not free speech. i just don't think private companies choosing what to censor is actually anti-free speech. the way we're talkin shit about eachothers views IS free speech. we're doing it now. lol

anti-homosexuality used to be a prevailing view obviously. societal movements changed that. maybe if enough rational people argued the things you're arguing and made good points then there would be a societal shift into uh, talking shit about jews i guess, but atm it seems only Crazy People have your opinions. sorry man, that's the way the cookie crumbles

i think it's good the way it is — cause to use it effectively, your team just stands on the other side of the fire to "trap" their enemies in it. u actually need to make a play to use it properly now

@DerFurst said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:

@DerFurst said:
you don't see the irony in calling for the censorship of hostile thoughts under the pretense of protecting people's civil rights

well considering that the "hostile thoughts" are the exact same conspiracies that meth heads get after smoking too much meth, i'm just anti-stupidity. if u believe it's your civil right to be a retard then that's ur prerogative, but it's also mine to call it out

yes, silly conspiracies like donald trump colluding with russia, who hacked the 2016 elections

imagine being so low IQ that instead of considering all those kinds of theories bad, you just think the ones that originate from an opposing political philosophy is bad

privately owned companies can censor whatever they want (and they'll catch shit for it from censored groups regardless)

I'm sure you'd be perfectly content if being a homosexual alone were a bannable offense on social media websites, or if being exposed as gay would get you immediately fired from your job and cause you to be unemployable afterwards

They Would Catch A Lot Of Shit For It, Is The Thing. chick fil-a is still trying to apologize. lol

@DerFurst said:
you don't see the irony in calling for the censorship of hostile thoughts under the pretense of protecting people's civil rights

well considering that the "hostile thoughts" are the exact same conspiracies that meth heads get after smoking too much meth, i'm just anti-stupidity. if u believe it's your civil right to be a retard then that's ur prerogative, but it's also mine to call it out

privately owned companies can censor whatever they want (and they'll catch shit for it from censored groups regardless)

@FavkisNexerade said:

@Frise said:

@FavkisNexerade said:
this game is about clowns doing acrobatic moves in circus, what did you expect? normal looknig fights are low level playstyles, if you want to be good - be best clown

It's easy to dismiss what you don't understand as simple or dumb. "being a clown" only works against mediocre players because it confuses them. High level gameplay is all about making your attacks as subtle as possible so that they're hard to read.

Balancing sword in mid air to make inertia unreadable is part of clown trick too, same as sniffing enemy toes to attack faster from above, same with rotating around to hit enemy heel behind a shield or behind block. High skill play is just a different type of circus, with less acrobatic clowns and with more smoothly spinning and balancing long sticks in mid air to confuse normal human brain behavior that makes people think that if 2m stick was accelerated, it'll go with some speed, and if it's not - then it wont deal damage.

isn't a major part of any competition based around confusing normal human brain behavior. wait til u learn about chess lol

also are u the same furry who got banned on the steam forums for saying the games mechanics are bad and insulting anyone who disagreed with you

edit: oh hes banned now. welp

@Unlikely said:
@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:

the reason why moderating intentions is so hard is BECAUSE we're dumbing down offensive language by just avoiding it entirely, which ironically gives the alt right a free range of post-irony to use at their disposal cause ppl are struggling to parse that shit. sure wonder why

Alt right racists have free rein to plainly say racist and Nazi shit in this forum and get away with it, no irony required at all. I know you know there are plenty of examples.

pretty sure its partly cause a lot of the mods post on 4chan like everyone else in this video game so they're reluctant to ban for """""opinions""""" cause they're so used to brushing that sort of shit off (and im sure a lot of them have their own questionable opinions)

i think the major part though is cause they can't tell when someone is joking or not so they're constantly playing it safe, hence my argument that we need to get better at determining intentions (ever since teen 4chan mouth breathers discovered sam hydes cell phone videos in fuckin 2013 or whatever they realized they can be freely racist by just pretending to be ironic. incredible)

@Musashi said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:
guarantee the ppl who tell ppl to turn chat off don't turn their chat off and just want to preserve the same environment cause they find it funny but are ironically too small dicked to actually say that opinion

i have chat off because it simply has nothing to do with dueling people. theres seriously nothing that anyone can type in that game that matters. my penis has nothing to do with this, gay skeleton

like 95% of this games playerbase posts on 4chan. ur tellin me they wouldn't find an uncensored vitriolic chat funny?? that's 4chans entire steez. come on dog lol

i'll give u the benefit of the doubt though cause u seem new so i actually believe you

guarantee the ppl who tell ppl to turn chat off don't turn their chat off and just want to preserve the same environment cause they find it funny but are ironically too small dicked to actually say that opinion