Before you start a new thread, you should ALWAYS check the existing threads. It's a well known problem and people always get told to save their loadouts. It's a simple textfile.

@traeng said:
New to the forum here, I am just wondering, are all people posting their bugs in this very thread?
Doing it that way, there are no way to see if a bug has been reported already, or to sort things properly.

Can't we create sub threads, that we can decide of the name of the bug, put the game version, and explain things about a defined bug?
I don't know if you have ever been to War Thunder's forums, but their bug reports are quite well done.

Devs don't care. That got suggested multiple times since the game got out.

Didn't read, but sounds like just another reason to remove the catapult until they manage to fix and balance it.

Do kids get ANY education at home these days?

Congratulations, you found one of the 20967 stuck spots in the game - which will never get fixed!

Well... yes.
Or... let's say it depends. Would you call closing the dedicated forums of a freshly released multiplayergame "normal"?

You won't get any help here anymore. I mean... less than before. You can try to search for existing threads (which you should ALWAYS do before posting), but don't expect anyone answering here. They shut down the forums and chased off everyone.

@Duckalot said:
I agree, Ranged is boring to play. Waaay too easy to score kills.

Now that comment about "easy kills" got a bit ironic after I saw you ingame... :P

@Eldainss said:
2 handed weapons overall would get faster swing speed... i would increase by 30 % or so, to see as start. (costly talent)1 handed weapons would get faster swing speed... i would start at 40 % increased speed, to start. (costly talent)
Core fix: Swords are slightly faster (5%) than other weapon types. 2 handed and 1 handed.Core fix: Axes to cause slightly higher dmg,5% to all armor.
**Core fix: Maces would get 10% extra dmg against heavy.. 5% against medium, and -5% against soft armor.

Weapons in general already do way too much damage and making them even faster would break the entire game. Apart from that, you'd need faster parries and all that, too.

Core fix: Shields would have Hitpoints, and can be used raised for as long as you want, but drain stamina on hit, and can break.
(if the shield breaks while blocking, you get knocked down)...Shields are also immune to Arrow dmg.

Giving shields hitpoints got suggested many times and I'd love to see that. Would finally make shields interesting.

Bows would be faster to draw and shoot.(25%).. Could also be used to block melee attack, but if so, break on first hit. (costly talent)2 types of arrows... armor piercing and blunt...obvious how they would function..(possibly fire arrows)..ONLY ONE can be slotted.

Bows should be able to parry attacks, but dropped after the first hit. Faster arrows would be nice, too.
Different quivers to equip (piercing tips, poison, whatever) would bring some variation, too.

Remove the "huntsman talent"...archers are fragile as they are.Reduce effect on Blood lust by 50%...(it is not a vampire vs vampire game)...(possibly even removed completely).

They both need to get removed. Horribly stupid perks, indeed.

*Melee Fists would have significant faster swing speed... increase by 40 % to start.

Fists are quite fast already and you can cause quite some damage in desperate situations.

*Remove all the "refill crates" on maps, and instead give that as tool option for engineers.

That wouldn't work, as that would always require active builders. But there should be an ammo bag similar to the medipacks.

@Bernat656 said:
Some people likes 64 player modes

But why? I had quite a few almost balanced and even borderline fun matches since the reduction, while before it was nothing but onesided and boring slaughterfests.

@SWSeriousMike said:

@^--^ Maximus ^--^ said:
it's a multiplayer with deep mechanics and an emphasis on skill. takes a lot of time to get good at it and its not always as easy as it looks in experienced hands.

Is it? I see neither deep mechanics nor an emphasis on skill at the moment. The emphasis of skill can only be a result of self-imposed limitations. The game itself doesn't require it at all.

Maximus voiced the average fanboy standpoint, about what the game is supposed to be but can't fulfil in the slightest, while you took the position of the exaggerating whiner, who strips the game of... well... everything.
Neither of you is correct, obviously.

The game does have some "deep mechanics", but aside the few melee mechanics, that "deep" turns into "derp". Wherever you look, the rest of the game is just half-assed.
And that "emphasis on skill" is hard to uphold when you have a gamebalance with that many blatant issues. It sure does require skill to be good - hell, it even does require skill to properly swing a Maul - but with that balance and as long as you see most high-level players simply running around with the most lowbob builds to pad stats, you can hardly attest this game an "emphasis on skill".

Too much, obviously. Would require a whole lot of programming, except you introduce a new kind of consructions that only builders can construct at FIXED places on the map, similar to wooden walls. But then it would kill the purpose of those holes, which are meant to be a nasty surprise.

Long story short: Computer says "no".

You are right about one or two things. For the rest: What exactly would you change and why?

The same that happened to many other users - banned for constant shitposting. Obviously.

Besides that... who is Sammy?

You have that ugly Crossbow skin...

@thecamguy said:
Hate the game, not the player.

That's like saying "Don't blame me for killing all those people, blame your police for not stopping me earlier!"
The players are to blame just as much as the lazy devs are. If it wasn't for the players who deliberately cheat, deliberately abuse exploits and bugs and glitches, deliberately are toxic and deliberately use every possible lowbob strategy to pad stats, we'd have a much nicer game already.

@CoCa said:
It's just a few ideas !

Ideas are always good, but you shouldn't just throw them into a thread and call it done. Don't be lazy. You need to elaborate them, thinking about how to implement them. Possible issues? How would they change the game?
The issues noted by the guy above are so obvious, you'd have stumbled across those after just a few seconds of thinking.

You should ask the guys on discord for help, but you need to elaborate your case and tell them what exactly you want or need to do.

You basically came here and asked "Hello guys, how do you cook food?"
That isn't enough information to come up with a proper answer.

Yupp. Especially the last stage allows you to get lots of damage done with those long hallways and bottlenecks.
The first stages are a bit difficult, but as soon as the match reaches the castle, you can help a lot as an active archer.

If a dev would come here and ask for help with that, I'd gladly help.
Otherwise it would be a waste of time, because noone cares.

@VampireDuck said:
tbh the forums was better when people were allowed to be autistic, now all we have are people complaining.

You still have Facebook for that, no need for that here. The forums were better when there were more normal people, but the devs never cared about the forums, so now everthing is dead.