Mordhau
 Cheto
  • Likes received 46
  • Date joined 21 May
  • Last seen 27 Jul

This user is suspended.

Private Message

78 46
  • 1 Jul
 Cheto

@LuxCandidus said:
That clip of someone flailing around with a spear is the first instance I have seen of such behaviour. I am not sure if it can be done with another weapon, but when it comes to the spear, it is a known bug.

@Deadmode said:
The example shown isn't high-level play, that's mid-tier stuff.

This is two players engaging in top-tier duelling, from a spec camera - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zElB89pdjYc - this looks more lifelike than the spear chap.

I will admit that it the spear guy does look odd though. The thing is, mechanically it is all necessary, it's only the animated representation of player inputs that look weird. I did make a post before about reducing the deflection ratio to mouse input of the torso so that the same moves can be performed mechanically, but with less of a bendy-human look.

It's a hard juggling act to get decent attack manipulation and disguising attacks in a GAME that does look somewhat realistic. However, if I was faced with the choice between realism and gameplay in Mordhau, I would prefer better gameplay than a realistic look, but that is just me.

Look at this pair... LOL LMAO, they are trying too fucking hard.

78 46
  • 1 Jul
 Cheto

@LumpyCustard said:
I get the hatred for the ballerina shit, and i understand why new players feel like it's a dirty / annoying tactic. Like i mentioned in my first post, it's hard enough as is to defend against feints and morphs for new players, the convulsions that "pro" players have is another level.

I've been playing in 'high' level duel servers (everyone was over level 50) and after about an hour of it you basically don't want to play the game anymore. I was getting kills and managed to come first, but it doesn't feel like the right way to play the game as the devs intended it.

That said, i get why it needs to exist, or else duels would just be permanent parry fests, but it feels like there should be a better solution.

Short clip of a sperg convulsing with a spear in my game earlier tonight:

https://streamable.com/jqit8

There you go... for the cunts that deny this crap, even a video of a cunt doing retarded ridiculous movements, it looks "super realistic" to quote that imbecile moderator with their shitty patronizing attitude, patronize that video.

78 46
  • 1 Jul
 Cheto

@smellycathawk said:
Can we all report Botas for spam?

I mean Cheto? Look at the last 3 posts in this thread alone, how is this not bannable spam?

then look at his entire post history and ban botas again lol

You did the exact same thing before i quoted your shitty spam, we should report you too.

78 46
  • 1 Jul
 Cheto

@BlueTeamLivesMatter said:
@smellycathawk

Do you have something you actually want to say?

At this point if you object to an argument of mine in any specific I invite you to elaborate. Otherwise, its probably best to cease trying to exacerbate a mild disagreement between two individuals who are not you.

78 46
  • 1 Jul
 Cheto

@BlueTeamLivesMatter said:
@smellycathawk

Do you have something you actually want to say?

At this point if you object to an argument of mine in any specific I invite you to elaborate. Otherwise, its probably best to cease trying to exacerbate a mild disagreement between two individuals who are not you.

REKT

78 46
  • 1 Jul
 Cheto

@BlueTeamLivesMatter said:

@Runagate said:
How is he patronizing lmao

@LuxCandidas said:
You can try out a duel of stamina warfare with a friend, etc....

Not everyone can claim the dubious accolade of being an alpha tester, but I do have 240 hours in game, including quite a lot of testing and dueling. They have no way of knowing that, but to automatically assume that someone holds an opinion you disagree with solely out of inexperience is patronizing. Argument by dismissal fallacy.

REKT

78 46
  • 30 Jun
 Cheto

@LuxCandidus said:

@Cheto said:
Really funny because you in your idiotic mind think that the game actually looks "realistic",stop disgising as a "neutral" person you are an elitist cunt too.

I do? Thanks for notifying me, since I was unaware I think that.

You are plugging your ears and ignoring what people are telling you, because you just want to be right. That is your only stake in the argument.

Nope, that right there is you the cunts that keep defending this retarded game mechanics and say: "it is realistic" when it clearly isn't, looks stupid AF.

78 46
  • 1
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@ShapiroLibtardsDieTwice said:
You can counter ballistas with firepots if they become an issue or flank the person around the map which I have done many times. Using a ballista already puts the person in a vulnerable spot to bows, crossbows, and throwables. Landing a hit will already force the person off for a brief period. In my opinion, the exploited impossible to reach spots without a guide should be removed, but the ballista is already in a good spot.

No, all you need to do is put a lvl 3 helment on your faggot builder and NO ONE will one shot you, the moment a LUCKY AF archer lands an arrow on your head you just back off and crouch and regenerate then go on with your BS....

Archers are so bad that they can't even help team mates being slaughtered by this faggotry ballista gameplay.

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@Ninjew said:
It's debateable whether or not they should even be in game, but being able to build inaccessible turrets with infinite ammo is breaking the game right now.

I agree, if archers need to go around finding ammunition they should too.

This is LAZY design and this shits are even more annoying than any archer can be, this BS cana ctually oneshot you, archers can't if you have armor.

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@smug said:
Not really atm.

The devs really need to step into the shoes of a pub player and realize that the game isn't all that fun for them right now. It's quite clear they spent too much time on certain aspects of the game and forgot to test important stuff like maps/horses etc.

Catering to the chiv community can only get you so far, and if your goal is to play with the same people once again for 5 more years instead of growing the game continue on this path you are treading.

They claim they are going to be better than Chivalry------> They go the exact same path and die.

Idiots.

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@smokratez said:
I stopped playing. Devs don't seem to listen to community. I'll check back in a month or so, however I suspect game will be dead by then. Sort of sad I spend money on this.

THIS.

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@Minion said:
I'm not pushing any idea, not sure why lazy is fixated on that, i said maybe the devs should use a testing server for anything.

the game has lost over 70% of its player base in barely 2 months, so maybe they were taking the wrong suggestions

Dude stop with the logic, can't you see this retards can't comprehend shit but their BIAS?

No really dude you are tearing them apart with your logic and now they look stupid as fuck, it only takes to ask them question tos ee how they are incompetent, they can't answer them and if they answer they answer shit like "it would be stupis", "you are an ape", "you don't understand the system", they are BIASED cunts that defend their exploits just like how an addict defends its addiction.

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@Minion said:

@smellycathawk said:

@Minion said:
I realise that you all really enjoyed chivalry and also enjoy the similarities between them but when the devs advertise their game as

"Believable fights: A game where fights look believable, MORDHAU strikes a balance between gameplay and realism"

When clearly the animations show the opposite. I realise the responses I'm going to get will have something to do with "skill ceiling, get better, as intended" or someone will bring up dragging again which has nothing to do with what keeps getting asked.

Tell me, which is it?

  • Did you watch the trailer and somehow not see the gameplay being advertised and only hear his words that are literally meaningless without the gameplay to inform and curb your expectations?
  • Or did you just not watch the trailer? And you're just jumping on the bandwagon of nubs quoting this line as a flimsy means of criticizing the game mechanically cause you can't actually criticise the mechanics properly cause you haven't bothered to really learn them before deciding to try and change them.

Cause you're making yourself look like idiots. "durr didn't know this was gonna be like chiv" meanwhile look at the fucking combat

How did you look at this, and expect it to not be like chiv? Either you are an idiot, or you didn't actually watch the trailer and aren't upset because of some shattered expectation derived from it, but instead you see a bunch of other players just quoting out of context "fights look like fights" so you jump on the bandwagon.

Are you stunned or something? tell me exacly where in that trailer you see anyone doing what people are complaining about, if you cant even contribute to the actual discuss watch from the corner. outside of people who played the alpha, the only thing people buying their game can base their purchase off of is the devs description and watching things such as the devs blogs. if you think the game would sell better if they changed the trailer and description to showcase what people are complaining about but you seem to like by all means see if it does better.

REKT

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@ToLazy4Name said:

@Minion said:
would it make it better or worse? what portion of the community would be most affected?

Weren't you the one that wanted sensitivity capped even when not swinging? Lmao that would completely destroy the game, and the other things people have suggested aren't much better

Yeah because you cunts wouldn't be able to cheese the game with exploits that is why "it would completely destroy the game".

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@Minion said:
I realise that you all really enjoyed chivalry and also enjoy the similarities between them but when the devs advertise their game as

"Believable fights: A game where fights look believable, MORDHAU strikes a balance between gameplay and realism"

When clearly the animations show the opposite. I realise the responses I'm going to get will have something to do with "skill ceiling, get better, as intended" or someone will bring up dragging again which has nothing to do with what keeps getting asked.

If body feints are they are being called are a none issue for high tier play, why the issue of asking the devs to fix it?

So just to clarify I'm fine with dragging I'm fine with feinting it's annoying sure but it's there. What I'm asking is the use of the animations intended or taken advantage of? Are the devs looking/working on it?

It would awesome if there was a response from someone who spoke for the devs or the devs themselves rather then the community.

Because they are fucking exploiters themselves, that is why they "don't see an issue"

78 46
  • 29 Jun
 Cheto

@LuxCandidus said:

@2B said:
The only fix I can think of to fix Drag and Speed, even though it's not really a Bug, just... exploiting... a Game Mechanic, is to Lock where you face for the Duration as you swing. meaning once you Swing there is no way to change where your looking till it's done. Even that can have problems too, there is no fix for this that I can see.

Maybe there is no fix because there is no issue to begin with, just a mechanic working as designed and intended. I am against only the most elite of players having a say regarding the state of the game, but when feedback comes from not even understanding the mechanics or point of the combat system, said feedback is worthless, occupies the developers' time, and buries other people's more sensible feedback.

In case an explanation is really needed: the very foundation of the genre is its free form swings allowing you to redirect your attacks, aim for the head only to switch to the legs, or to switch to a different opponent entirely, to manipulate the timing of your attack in order to throw off your opponent, and to have incredibly accurate hitboxes due to the real-time calculation of the swings. With lock-on the game would just be first-person Dark Souls PvP, it would be impossible to fight multiple opponents at once, and the significant overhead of swings being calculated in real-time would be a pointless waste of performance.

Really funny because you in your idiotic mind think that the game actually looks "realistic",stop disgising as a "neutral" person you are an elitist cunt too.

78 46
  • 27 Jun
 Cheto

@Erwinicus said:
I think they should make the longbow insta-kill everyone on the server as soon as you nock the arrow. Once you shoot the arrow it should crash the server and uninstall the game for everyone who uses a 2-hander.

This would make it more viable and less hypocritical.

This right here is the typical fanboy mentality and strawman argument they use to deal with criticizm of this game, thank you for your incredible display.

78 46
  • 1
  • 27 Jun
 Cheto

@TombstoneJack said:
I demand the speed buffs to arrows form last patch be changed back I cant hit anything now!

Honestly, i think such a minuscle change made things worse than better, now not only you have to re adjust for the minor speed buff but it isn't even enough to call it significant it was just a terrible change overall.

78 46
  • 27 Jun
 Cheto

@ToLazy4Name said:

@Cheto said:

@LumpyCustard said:
Hilarious, archers complaining about cavalry being annoying.

What is hilarious about that?, archers can not oneshot anyone but other archers, archery is nerfed in this game, what is hilarious special person?

So you want archers to be able to 1 shot t3 armor or something?

edit: also, hello botas how are you today

No i don't want that i'm saying that horses need an obvious nerf, arrow damage is perfectly fine for me, the arrow speed needs a serious buff that is the problem with archery right now.

78 46
  • 27 Jun
 Cheto

@LumpyCustard said:
Hilarious, archers complaining about cavalry being annoying.

What is hilarious about that?, archers can not oneshot anyone but other archers, archery is nerfed in this game, what is hilarious special person?