Mordhau
 Clyde
  • Likes received 178
  • Date joined 10 May
  • Last seen 13 Oct

Private Message

60 178
  • 30 Aug
 Clyde

Glad to see new content! I really like duelling and LTS.

60 178
 Clyde

@Punzybobo said:
20190620193647_1.jpg

is this a runescape cosplay? lmao

60 178
 Clyde

@Unlikely said:
@smug to @Clyde:

and i hate to shatter your schizophrenic delusions, but the developers aren't on your side.

I really want to believe you're right about this. And yet, @Clyde is still here, spouting white supremacist nonsense for 48 hours straight.

anything for me is a victory as a dissident. You are reactionary and trying to preserve the status quo, I am trying to destroy it. any time I can speak I win. if they censor me in the future and I've been in enemy territory the entire time, its no different from anywhere on the internet and I've made use of the opportunity I've been given to speak my ideas, if they don't censor me but disagree with me and don't listen to me I've spread my ideas, if they agree with me and listen to me I win. There is no outcome of my speaking here where I lose anything. Doing nothing, however? I always lose making that choice.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

@smug said:

@Clyde said:
There is a difference between consequences between two individuals or an individual and groups and a central power over an individual or group. when you call people ethnic slurs in real life that's called fighting words as they can not walk away from the conflict, on the internet they can choose who they associate with and peoples ability to speak to them very easily, and there's no central authority needed, you are calling for it to exist, I'm saying it shouldn't. you totally have no agency in calling for censorship. It's just a consequence of their actions, no agency or design behind the censorship. That's totally how this works, and you aren't lying in any way.

I can't wait to be censored by the government and state as long as I get to watch my corporate sponsored esports. The speech of the average user to say what they want and do what they want is worth infinitely more than, soy boys getting their esports prizes. if the ring of power corrupts their game it should just be thrown away, as the community and game are better off without donations from corporations ruining our ability to speak in game. The majority of the players won't lose out in the slightest bit if this doesn't have a big e-sports scene it will lose out massively our speech is controlled by corporate interests in the name of keeping advertisers.

big brainlet the game developers ARE the central authority in regards to their dedicated servers and the events they may run in the future.

and i hate to shatter your schizophrenic delusions, but the developers aren't on your side.

You are saying is just a natural innate consequence for them to censor that there is no agency that's just naturally how it is, that's blatantly false. You think they should be censored, and I don't they should, it's not natural law of cause and reaction that people get censored when they say ethnic slurs. that is false. Going woke and broke censoring people will destroy the game, the game not being an e-sport doesn't matter. They can run and fund their own events, and people can get their own sponsorships, the dev team should maintain power in those deals or not have them at all. They should put their community first, not profit or, e-sports.

All you are doing here is trying to gaslight me. "you have no power here." we'll see about that, but I won't stop speaking and resisting this nonsense till I'm forced to. We'll see how the effects of my side's speech have the developers when they make their choices. You want me to stop speaking because I have utterly controlled the forum in every single thread on every single narrative, and no I won't. I don't have to rely on lies and Alinsky tactics like you I just have to speak the truth. People like someone who is genuine, and hate people who call for censorship, and lie, like you. So we'll, in fact, see where the dice fall eventually.

60 178
 Clyde

There is a difference between consequences between two individuals or an individual and groups and a central power over an individual or group. when you call people ethnic slurs in real life that's called fighting words as they can not walk away from the conflict, on the internet they can choose who they associate with and peoples ability to speak to them very easily, and there's no central authority needed, you are calling for it to exist, I'm saying it shouldn't. you totally have no agency in calling for censorship. It's just a consequence of their actions, no agency or design behind the censorship. That's totally how this works, and you aren't lying in any way.

I can't wait to be censored by the government and state as long as I get to watch my corporate sponsored esports. The speech of the average user to say what they want and do what they want is worth infinitely more than, soy boys getting their esports prizes. if the ring of power corrupts their game it should just be thrown away, as the community and game are better off without donations from corporations ruining our ability to speak in game. The majority of the players won't lose out in the slightest bit if this doesn't have a big e-sports scene it will lose out massively our speech is controlled by corporate interests in the name of keeping advertisers.

60 178
 Clyde

@smug said:

@Clyde said:
These "Gaming journalists" are online activists, not journalists the same with their mainstream counterparts. They are applying pressure to the devs with lies and swarms of articles to push their agenda, it's obvious and nothing new with have not seen out of them they've been doing it for years now. They have no power other than what is given to them and people think they have. they are basically blogging activists role-playing as journalists.

The SJWs have no power.

and

The all powerful SJWs are influencing the developers oh no!

Schizophrenic literally confirmed.

"RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)"

They have as much power as people think they do, and give them was my point, There was no contradiction.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

"RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”

It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”

Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)"

Every single one of these rules are being used. We aren't blind to it. mainly 1, 5, 8, 9, and 12.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

These "Gaming journalists" are online activists, not journalists the same with their mainstream counterparts. They are applying pressure to the devs with lies and swarms of articles to push their agenda, it's obvious and nothing new with have not seen out of them they've been doing it for years now. They have no power other than what is given to them and people think they have. they are basically blogging activists role-playing as journalists.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

@FoxyTorryn said:
Game chat isn't the problem. You can mute all chat if you want. You can mute individual players but I would say the current implementation of muting players is subpar and unintuitive. I would prefer we be able to mute players from the scoreboard. The real "toxicity" problem is bull shit like people teamkillinging because they didn't get the balista fast enough or being a useless fuck with a lute or skateboard pavise and doing nothing to contribute to the actual match. You could attempt a votekick but most people don't pay enough attention. They should add team damage and team kill stats to show when votekicking a player.

based furry. toxicity has always referred to people actively undermining the team with team kills or helping the other team it comes from league of legends. No one cares if you are offended by mean words.

60 178
 Clyde

Ironically the people complaining about toxicity are more than willing to harass people, insult them, gaslight them, dox them, silence them, lie about them, promote violence against them, punch, them and try to kill them "by any means necessary" needs to be taken seriously they have no limitations ethically in this conflict. They've written articles for years about how it's not only ok but obligatory to punch people they disagree with in the streets, libel, harassment, violence, doxing, and toxicity are the left's bread and butter and you think they give a shit about mean words on the internet? No, they don't care about toxicity, this is absolutely all about power. They are trying to wield power over the developers with their lying press gaming press as well.

If the developers don't bend the knee and give them the power they will be attacked relentlessly. just like if individuals do not bend a knee to their narratives the left will try to destroy them the left will try to destroy the devs. For them, this is espionage and warfare, and this another outlet for that conflict. This is about power and a conflict that is and will be apart of our lives regardless of what we do about it. I'm happy to walk away from the conflict but they are not, But these people want me not just silenced in or removed from the game they want me broke, homeless and ultimately dead, and I believe its vital to resist every bit of power they try to grab in any capacity that could be used against me.

Please, Stand up to these people if they commit libel against them hold them to account and completely and totally destroy them with lawsuits. They have no power over you or the community and you owe them no response they are malicious, and concern trolling you. Let your community do what it wants, say what it wants and police itself with the vote kicking and mute system. if anyone is malicious they will be naturally punished, the majority of your customer despise censorship and social justice bullshit and will be turned off if you go woke and broke.

I want to support gave developers with a spine which is why I bought the game day one even though I had doubts if I would enjoy it, I supported the game team because they seemed to have their heads on straight and would support the community enjoying the game the way we have for years now. Thanks for your time and giving us the capacity to voice our interests, and complaints here.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

@vanguard said:
I told the devs and mods when the anti politics rule was made that eventually, a bunch of right wing mongoloids would fuck things up, again, and here we are. With a fucking journo article on the fact.

Do us all a favor and stop posting Donald. Aside from your monetary contribution to the project, you are literally a dead weight on this community, like every other right wing imbecile that can't shut the fuck up. You all do harm to the game and community, and are a bunch of inconsiderate fucks that have no empathy with the YEARS of hard work the devs have put into their project, and are shitting all over it like the fucking manchild you are.

Go read a fucking book you pieces of shit.

The community acting freely the way it wants didn't cause the articles to happen the articles would have happened regardless because it's a popular game and the journalists need clicks and they also need it to push their and your agenda they would have done this regardless. the community enjoying the game in the way we want to isn't harming the game they built, you are saying as a threat at the developers and people you disagree with you are threating to wield power over them. it's not us doing the harm, it's you and the journalists making threats at them to get them to censor people you don't like.

This is our community we formed years ago with chivalry, we have our own standards and the way we enjoy the game, you want to force the developers to come in and dictate the community words the community uses and dictate the tone of and topics of discussion that's overtly political while your game journo lying press buddies stand over your shoulder pointing a gun at the devs and you blame us for it. we're not actively writing articles to try to destroy the devs creation and wouldn't do anything of the sort, your side would, however, wield every lever of power possible against them if they resisted the left in any way. You would try to destroy the game and are threatening to do so while blaming us.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

@thomas said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiS3kNa8q9k

I think Allsup's video was better at covering the subject, but both are good in terms of narrative.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Gamer began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy -- willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Gamer began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Gamer began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Gamer began to hate.

It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Gamer began to hate.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

I wish I had the creativity you guys have but my designs are dogshit, I'll post them soon™

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

@Donald Trump said:
You spend your time on neo-nazi forums and then precede to invite me onto neo-nazi forums. You promise to only want to restrict certain kinds of speech justifying it with a better society, I'm sure the Nazis said something similar. You're absolutely obsessed with Nazism. You think that because someone posts an edgy meme they're going to be rounding up minorities the next day.

I'm sure anti-gay people who watch gay porn are just doing it to 'know their enemy'. I'm actually protecting the freedom of speech of LGBT, minorities and women. You want to limit their speech.

Me: I believe in free speech

Clyde: I don't believe in free speech

You: REEEEEEE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME PERSON AND POSITION

To fight neo-nazism you want to act like neo-nazis. Have you ever of horse shoe theory? You and your ilk are pretty much the same as Clyde to me. Do your check under your bed for the big scary neo-nazi boogeyman? Do you ask if your food is neo-nazi free? Better meet a tinder date in public, they just might be a neo-nazi. I dub thee the three stooges of Delusional Deadmode, SJWSeriousDyke, and the DictatorintheNorth

We may or may not agree on a lot of things, but one thing for sure the left views this as espionage and warfare, not a political debate. I don't believe in free speech because I don't believe it should be applied to people who refuse to reciprocate it. just like I don't believe in pacifism against people who are adamant about being violent with me. if someone censors you, or punch you they are wielding power in your direction, you have to wield power over them asking them to stop censoring you or punching you will not work you have to deal with them as what they are a threat, if someone is a threat to you and wants to put upon you, you have to beat them into submission. The left will wield power in this conflict over you and win if you do nothing, you can resist them genuinely and effectively under the rules of war they are fighting you under or you can stick to your principles and lose the war which the right has been doing for decades and losing ground every generation.

60 178
  • 5 Jul
 Clyde

@unabridgedpenis said:

@Clyde said:
The population of all games on steam generally goes down after launch mordhau on the other hand, by comparison, is holding onto its player base very well. it just needs more armour, weapons, and maps to be released over time, all games are going to lose their player base to newer ones as they come and players are split up between a growing library of games this is fine. Mordhau competes very well and has a community of people worth playing with the problem with this is its a lie told by people who are trying to get the power to censor speech they dislike, Everyone knows that's why they are spinning this narrative, we aren't blind deaf and dumb to your schemes and plans to create, grab and wield positions of power over us. The game is good its community is good, you people, however, are not good for the game or players and want the devs to go woke and broke for your agenda.

Dude, seriously, I get you have issues with lefties and SJWs and all that jazz, I don't really disagree. But shoehorning this shit into every post you make makes you look like a Botas. It waters down your message and makes everyone groan with thoughts of "Here we go, Clyde is going full Botas and trying to seize the game from the leftists again."

The absolutely are concern trolling for an ulterior motive, that's a vital part of what I'm trying to say. I wouldn't be like this if they wouldn't have made my entire life a battlefield for the survival of my folk. If they weren't a threat to me and my nation, if they were consistently grabbing for power and wielding power over me in every space I go to. Then, yes I could and would shut up about the topic, but for now, I feel its a vital topic I can't be silent about.

60 178
 Clyde

@concubicycle said:
Toxic chat is only an aspect of "toxicity". It's a symptom of a garbage community, which many of us don't want to be a part of. And it should be in the interest of game companies to keep civil, inclusive communities. Sorry if not being able to spam racial slurs in a video game is having such a chilling effect on your positive freedom of speech.

We are a part of the community that have already formed our own decisions of decency, without you from the days of chivalry to rising storm steam players universally despise this type of shit. if you don't want to be a part of it you can stop playing the game. I don't want to play with people like yourself. I want to play in a game and community where people can say what they want and act how they want, that is exclusive to people like you who want to control the topics of discussion tone of discussion and words used and will not budge on this.

60 178
 Clyde

@ZugZugNeverEnds said:

@SWSeriousMike said:

@jcdenton said:
You won't win arguments with delusional hyperbole. If think the threat is real, you'd take the opportunity to confront them with "the truth", to change their mind. Suppressing them, like squeezing a water bomb, only makes them over express elsewhere. This is the entire reason we have people expressing themselves in games now, because they squeezed free expression out of political sites and discussion boards. Reality is, you don't really care enough to do the actual confrontation and argument, you are just taking the opportunity to LARP for a lazy ego massage.

I wonder why I can only read your "truth" in a forum with totally overwhelmed moderators and why you never provide any sources for your outrageous claims. Why does your truth hide in the outer rim of the internet where the sun doesn't shine if it is so glorious?

There was no hyperbole by the way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlottesville_car_attack
And I'm confronting your bullshit at this moment. Just as you told me.

But please go on, tell me your "truth" to make a clear case for your forum ban. I will gladly quickly glance over it before I report it. I promise!

what is your evidence for those in the car being 1: white and 2:nazist and/or racist?
did the (((news))) tell you that?

It's safe to assume fields was an ethnonationalist or national socialist, It's safe to assume fields attended the rally because he wanted to hear people speak out that he respected online, its safe to assume he wanted to protest a monument to his ancestors being removed none of those things are illegal or immoral, it's not safe to assume he wanted to kill people at intentionally did kill people leaving that rally if fields were a terrorist...this is America we can buy things called guns terrorists don't have to use vehicles to run people over, if he was a terrorist he would have, should have, and could have laid waste to that crowd of anti-white communist terrorists multiple with firearms and the body count would have been in the 2 or 3 digits at least, and been an actual example of terrorism and he didn't. If he's going to go to prison for life as an innocent man why shouldn't he have taken out a far larger amount of his enemies before being imprisoned for his speech and beliefs under unjust government force and lies?

The reality was he didn't commit terrorism and had no intention of doing so he had a car accident caused by the chaos sewn by his enemies who played stupid games and got stupid prizes. Shockingly when you "make racists afraid again." they have defend themselves with lethal force. he wanted to go to peaceful rally meet some new friends, listen to speeches of online creators, march peacefully, do everything you would expect out of a meeting of white people similar to that of an anime convention in terms of violence, then go home. He did not want to go on a suicide mission he wanted to go home in one piece there is no argument or evidence of anything else.

60 178
  • 4 Jul
 Clyde

@Highlander said:

@Clyde said:
No, I will not cede any ground to the left, They have not added women or non-whites to the game yet and I won't support them if they do I and I will protest them ruining the game I paid for by appealing to people like you. This game is based on european identity and it should celebrate it, white european identity if you want it to be something else go play another game. there is nothing wrong with them making a game for white men. If other people like it sure? Enjoy it. I don't care, but I refuse to play a game where sub-Saharan-African women wear gothic knight armour, and I refuse to not speak up against it and resist it and speak out against it and there is nothing you can do to stop it. It's not a game just about sword combats its a game expression the european collective unconsciousness and history and you want to undermine white identity by design by destroying this representation in pop culture.

Jesus Christ a Voltaire quoter before you write a fucking essay about how mordhau represents “ the spiritual collective unconscious “ of Europe or whatever just find out what is ACTUALLY happening. Girls are being added into the game but you can toggle them off in your game setting easily if you want more historical accuracy. Jfc

Are you up to date on the words of the developer, they said they had no intention of doing that now, I bought the game because it looked like they had a spine and were standing up to this nonsense and saying "no we won't ruin your experience and immersion by appealing to social justice." Now they are capitulating and say that toggle thing was uncalled for to even have in the game which is why multiple people I know bought the game to begin with "these people seem like they have spines they are worth giving my money to even if the game is shit." Which is why I'm here arguing my position whether or not it affects anything is another question, but for the moment I won't stop till the developers have made a choice and the conflict is over which considering the left is the later is never going to happen.

60 178
  • 4 Jul
 Clyde

@esturias said:

@Clyde said:
Would you stop lying that the game has no connection to european history and identity, that IS nonsense. and you know it.
Game of Thrones is a series inspired by european identity and history to say otherwise is fucking stupid, and you know it. specifically, British history and identity because GRRM and most Americans are WhiteAnglo-Saxons Protestants.

Would you please stop turning my words around and just answer the questions? You are constantly ignoring simple questions and blabbering about something completely different instead.
I asked you if those films/games are about history. I didn't ask if they have features inspired by history.
If you think they are about history, would you please show me the white walkers in our European history and the dragonblood in our European identity?
And again: GoT is completely free of "colour"?

Bottomline: You claim that a few features inspired by history turn a game into a historical game with some kind of identity, regardless of the fact that the game is completely silly and unrealistic. That's still nonsense.
Kingdom Come Deliverance got mentioned. THAT is a game about history. THERE a major change would be worth a discussion.

@Clyde said:
Its a computer game based on medieval european history and white identity. You are lying if you say otherwise. I bought the game so I could do just that and I will not cede a single inch as I've said in the opening. By doing this you pollute the game identity and it loses the value it had to the people that bought it, to begin with for the whit medieval identity it had and you know that.

The only thing I know is that you are really deluded if you keep talking about "history" and "identity" in a silly game like this one.

btw: Still no examples of polluted games and stuff.

I'm not here to talk with you but at you, I don't give a damn about what you have to say, as far as it gives me a platform to discuss my ideas in response, your ideas are worthless and you have done nothing but lie in this thread.

The first men, Andals, and Targaryens are clearly all based on ethnic groups that have been a part of British history overall being part of the same Aryan ethnic group. The world of a game of Thrones is much like our own human the first men are clear analogues of the celts an Aryan group, the various Saxon groups in the andals mixing out in the same way it did in reality with the isles themselves with the more Celtic first men in the north. The Targaryen are clear analogues of the Normans who conquered both conquered their retrospective islands.

The Rhoynar are supposed to be southern european but in the show, they were shown as Latinos. There was a big debate in the casting over whether or not they should hire Pedro Pascal to play the role of Oberyn Martell because he almost passes as white, but ultimately they hired him and changed the way they looked in the books to be far darker in the tv show than the books, in the books you have the further inland you get the less swarthy and more nordic the people of the land becomes into three different categories salty, sandy, and stony. Salty being low caste olive skinned, to sandy being more mixed, to stony being almost pure Andal. The world took from and was designed after the real world peoples.

GRRM doesn't try to hide this he's open about it and wearings it on his sleeve that its inspired by european history. Just because there are fantasy elements to it does not mean it doesn't have my culture an identity represented in it and it wasn't that way by design to appeal to me by design. if he would have based his fiction in the African part of his map the novels, and tv show would not be a success because white people do not give a shit about African history, or identity, they care about their own and want consume pop culture that celebrates it that is fine. don't like it? consume something else.

Bottom line is I have an interest and I'll argue for it and I'll explicitly state what I want from the devs and there is nothing you can do to stop me from doing so. I want a eurocentric game out of this and kingdom come deliverance I will not stop, you won't stop at this game as you were most likely arguing to undermine the identity of and historical atmosphere of KCD as well. I don't see why you think I would draw the line and retreat from one game and not the other when I know you want to give me neither. Its all or nothing in that sense. I won't give an inch. I want everything or nothing.

I'm not going to give you any examples because I've already done it multiple times anti-white media everywhere you are going to be willfully ignorant of it because you want it, and I don't. You know it exists, you know it's being created and you are calling for it yourself, stop lying. You aren't pulling the wool over anyways eyes here or are going to waste my time sourcing the mass of games eurocentric pop culture and history polluted with non-white characters being created to undermine white identity.