Mordhau
 smug
  • Likes received 483
  • Date joined 4 May
  • Last seen 15 Jul

Private Message

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

This is a nonissue

328 483
  • 1
  • 15 Jul
 smug

They didn't test FL much in alpha.

You think horses would of been released in the state they are if comp alpha players experienced them daily? It's extreme arrogance from Trit's part that it's taking them even this long to nerf them.

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

@smokratez said:

@smug said:

@smokratez said:

@smug said:

@smokratez said:

@smug said:

@smokratez said:

@smug said:
Consequences for being retarded isn't censorship.

Censoring people for saying things you don't like isn't rightful or justified. It's an abuse of power because you are scared of what they say. You know your side is set of a throne of lies. You want to censor people because you fear the truth.

I dont want their posts deleted or ability to say anything taken away, what I want is temp bans or any sort of punishment.

You want to punish people for disagreeing with you. That's more than a bit silly.

Debate is different than calling people slurs, or other equally cringe actions.

Do you feel the same way about racism against white people?

Of course, its extremely cringe you’re trying to link me to a United Nations white genocide conspiracy when all I want is for people who break rules and act offensively be punished for their actions.

There are already punishments in place. White genocide is not a conspiracy. Forced immigration alone will result in the mixing of races and as a result the white race being fased out. Which is a definition of genocide.

"Dude white genocide duh."

"Wtf you want to punish people for certain kinds of speech? Wtf ur literally Marx"

"Dude chill out there are already punishments."

A bonus:

"Dude it's just words on a screen man, words don't mean anything. Why did Humans ever evolve the capacity for speech, or write great works of literature, or even bother writing things out with words amirite?"

Lenient moderation was a mistake.

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

@smokratez said:

@smug said:

@smokratez said:

@smug said:

@smokratez said:

@smug said:
Consequences for being retarded isn't censorship.

Censoring people for saying things you don't like isn't rightful or justified. It's an abuse of power because you are scared of what they say. You know your side is set of a throne of lies. You want to censor people because you fear the truth.

I dont want their posts deleted or ability to say anything taken away, what I want is temp bans or any sort of punishment.

You want to punish people for disagreeing with you. That's more than a bit silly.

Debate is different than calling people slurs, or other equally cringe actions.

Do you feel the same way about racism against white people?

Of course, its extremely cringe you’re trying to link me to a United Nations white genocide conspiracy when all I want is for people who break rules and act offensively be punished for their actions.

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

@smokratez said:

@smug said:

@smokratez said:

@smug said:
Consequences for being retarded isn't censorship.

Censoring people for saying things you don't like isn't rightful or justified. It's an abuse of power because you are scared of what they say. You know your side is set of a throne of lies. You want to censor people because you fear the truth.

I dont want their posts deleted or ability to say anything taken away, what I want is temp bans or any sort of punishment.

You want to punish people for disagreeing with you. That's more than a bit silly.

Debate is different than calling people slurs, or other equally cringe actions.

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

@smokratez said:

@smug said:
Consequences for being retarded isn't censorship.

Censoring people for saying things you don't like isn't rightful or justified. It's an abuse of power because you are scared of what they say. You know your side is set of a throne of lies. You want to censor people because you fear the truth.

I dont want their posts deleted or ability to say anything taken away, what I want is temp bans or any sort of punishment.

328 483
  • 3
  • 15 Jul
 smug

I dont like how the only viable way to play horde is, LMB, run, LMB for 1000 times. The devs should make the horde bots hit you for much less damage, allowing people to use more of the game’s mechanics beyond just lmb kiting, maybe also make it so the horde AI doesnt facehug you so hard.

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

Consequences for being retarded isn't censorship.

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

@OccidentalOverdose said:

@CatR said:
Eid Of Norway of course neglects to mention the Jewish and Romani presence in the 19th and 20th centuries, which were greatly diminished in the 1940s due to the systemic extermination of these peoples.

Jews and gypsies were never found in large numbers in Norway, and their presence in Europe has always been destructive. They certainly didn't shape European history in a meaningful and positive way. They have always been to Europe what fleas are to a dog.

The Mordhau forums ladies and gentleman.

328 483
  • 15 Jul
 smug

If you think the game doesn't attract these certain kinds of people you are either, not involved enough in the community to know, or disingenuous to the point where you can post on these forums and not see exactly what we're talking about.

328 483
  • 3
  • 14 Jul
 smug

Skillceiling is lower than Chiv despite being a less gay game. You can't really change that fact without buffing swing manipulation thus making the game gay again. Even though chambering is cool, I really wouldn't want to play a chamber heavy meta either as high level 1vX engagements are already cancer due to chambering + other factors.

328 483
  • 14 Jul
 smug

Its pointless to engage with someone this delusional.

328 483
  • 14 Jul
 smug

Mordhau was a success because it had white ppl in it, and 90% of the sales were altrighters, and free speech absolutists.

328 483
  • 14 Jul
 smug

Mordhau is a symbol of your “white identity”. Yeah I guess the vice article was completely wrong about the community.

328 483
  • 5
  • 14 Jul
 smug

Never said that. What I mean is that the entire design of the map is obviously to make it a horse map. 10% of the area is the center point, the rest is open space for the horses.

No you're projecting that onto the map because it's literally horse fields with the center keep thrown in, but the actual objective itself has nothing to do with the existence or the nonexistence of horses. The horses probably make less sense in this case because it's a KOTH map which you didn't even address. Lets use your logic for a second, is camp also a "horse" map because it has wide open spaces?

Don't forget that Frontline is a casual mode and apparently a lot of people like horses (me not).

Dude no, you're so out of touch with the community if you believe that the majority of people like horses. Just no dude. https://www.reddit.com/r/Mordhau/comments/cd5rw2/the_crossroads_blue_team_experience/

I literally see that within 5 seconds of opening reddit

, but because of the map design that reinforces all the cancer in the game (javelins, fire bombs). In fact I made a forum post about this when Crossroads came out.

Yes but limiting ammo boxes doesn't fix the actual geometry problems with the map layout. All the maps in Mordhau are objectively bad for FrontLine, even grad which is considered the "best" because of how crowded they get at the 48-64 player level. Bringing the number of horses on par with the rest of the maps makes crossroads more bearable because more of the map is opened up for skirmishes just like every other fucking frontline map. Are the "limited" ammo boxes stopping firebomb spam on other maps? They are cancer there too. You only see jav spam on crossroads? Lets not be disingenuous.

328 483
  • 5
  • 14 Jul
 smug

How are horses an entity which rarely contributes to capping the center point in a KOTH map, where the objective IS to cap and hold the center point as long as possible, the SOLE purpose of the map? As I've said the only purpose they serve is locking down areas of the map due to their sheer power and number. Once again what's exactly the point of designing flank routes for blue, if they rarely ever get utilized because no one wants to play frogger on the sides of CR? Just think about the inherent logic of the map for a second. The left gate that is locked for BLUE, if opened allows access to the stairs which allows blue to flank the battlements to prevent red from guarding the ladders. Yet this is never seen because it's impossible to even open the gate or defend it while its opened.

ammo boxes as crush suggested

Yeah he's incredibly out of touch, and just because crush says something doesn't make it objectively fact, when crossroads was released this bad, hell I don't trust the developers in this instance because they managed to make CR worse not better through patching with the removal of forward spawns. If I were to do a statistical analysis of all the complaints levied toward CR, I'm fairly certain that around 75% of them would involve horses.

328 483
  • 1
  • 14 Jul
 smug

@Atlas-D said:

@CocyxTheGaySkeleton said:
beliefs.png

Yes, it's completely reasonable to compare someone who actually had sexual activity with minors to random people on the internet with a controversial political ideology and people who use mean words to describe players who use playstyles they hate in a video game. Not every country has thought police, Cocyx.

This isn't about mean words in a videogame though.

Trit have said things like "power in the players hands" and something along the lines of "we want to avoid censorship." That just screams "1488 Racewar now," which according to you, is "my side."

Playing coy is pointless.

328 483
  • 14 Jul
 smug

See the problem is you think Trit is on your side.

328 483
 smug

@Cence said:
No, the areas where you are supposed to fight are narrow and constrained. Outside of the fort is basically horse land and if you don't want to engage there you don't have to.

Yes that's my point.

How is making a 48-64 player map where the intended areas of which to engage the enemy are "narrow and constrained" good map design? The map would be more well received if you could skirmish in the outersides of the map which serve no purpose just like the areas in Mountain Peak. Actually in CR there are direct flanking routes that are outright given to blue to open up the left gate, but no one ever attempts it because of the fucking horses. In a world WITHOUT horses red would have to pay more attention to left side pushes rather than just camping the front hole and ladders atm. (Right side if you're playing from red pov)

You seriously think people like fighting on the CR bridge and because of parry knockback they fall to their deaths? You think they like fighting on the center obj platform when some memelords are running firepot builds and lighting it up?

Horses make the map WORSE, because they limit people to fighting in these absolute trash areas if they don't want to be speared by a horse every 10 seconds.

328 483
  • 1
  • 14 Jul
 smug

Mods please close this before it just devolves into a personal attack thread.

It's already run it's course.