Mordhau
 Survii
Knight
  • Likes received 391
  • Date joined 6 Sep '16
  • Last seen 1h
Private Message
Knight 243 391
  • 10 May
 Survii

@ToLazy4Name said:
WHERE'S CRUSH

He's omnipresent, how else can he stay the true defender of the forums 24/7?

Knight 243 391
  • 10 May
 Survii

@slutman said:
20170510_003132.jpg

fify.png
FIFY TBH

Knight 243 391
  • 9 May
 Survii

@KIWI said:
Stuff I've drawn, think this is the only medieval stuff I've done.

everything else was hentai

Knight 243 391
  • 9 May
 Survii

My political views tbh
https://youtu.be/dRGlon_ezvU

Knight 243 391
  • 8 May
 Survii

@EruTheTeapot said:
I grew that fucking bird for whole winter, I don't need to imagine it being tortured you cuck

@EruTheTeapot said:
grew

bird.jpg

Knight 243 391
  • 7 May
 Survii

someones getting banned...

Knight 243 391
  • 6 May
 Survii

@DerFurst said:

@vanguard said:

@DerFurst said:

@vanguard said:

I find it funny how you can make this sort of critique to banks and this mode of production as a whole, and yet be against communism. Communism would be the overcome of such contradictions, isnt that good?

A country should be nationalistic and autarkic if it wants to avoid international parasites. Communism is by its nature open borders and internationalist. Communism doesn't properly safeguard itself from the enemies they are fighting against in the first place. You will not rid yourself of these bankers, capitalists, and mass media culture creators unless you are strongly nationalistic. Communism cannot do this.

I don't see how you can get rid of these bankers, capitalists and mass media without getting rid of capitalism first, the whole profit logic thing. More then a border issue, its a economic question you see, doesn't matter what kind of government it has, if it is capitalism, these things will happen.

Some "profit logic" is a natural drive for people. No one would want to do work without the promise of being rewarded somehow. You can say that "the state will provide your needs," but who would be motivated if they expected something regardless? That kind of treatment creates entitlement, and entitled people do not feel like working. You could also say "they will work to better their community," but if you've seen the amount of kindness people have in their hearts, it wouldn't be enough to do work for free. People need to make "something" for their work, and money does just fine so long as it's an honest currency.

The issue with "profit logic" is that in a capitalism system, the gaining of "capital" is the only drive. The ideal people should have is this: honesty and nobility in dealing with other people in business - no lies, no scams, no exploitation. Money stops being the focal point. The only way to make people smarter, kinder, and more honest is through a cultural shift at a massive scale. For that to happen, the country must be nationalistic, for if there is no sense of national identity involving such ideas, how are you possibly going to convince a whole nation to follow them? Communism has no provisions for actually changing the hearts and minds of anyone. It expects that as soon as their economic system is implemented, people will somehow magically change themselves and everything will work out...

Its what we see in nationalist experiences, as far as I understand it. How can nationalism and autarky overcome capitalism within its borders?

People's beliefs are more important than laws or systems in place. Communism attempts to change the economic system without taking into account the nature of people. It's bound to fail because of this.

Nationalism is the shared idea or "spirit" of the nation. It's impossible to convince an entire nation to believe in specific ideals unless they feel they are part of the nation. If part of the spirit of the nation is to be honest, smart, kind, and caring, then it will not matter what economic system is in place, because the people will act in accordance to their beliefs of goodness. Nationalism is the only reasonable way I've seen that's possible of creating a culture of goodness at the scale of a nation. In communism, there is no notion of a "nation" or "borders," just people. Communism mixes people together to the extent where there is no identity. If there's no shared identity, what reason is there for one man to care about his fellow? They are unlike him in every way. Why would he want to help them?

+111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
DerFurst actually seems to be the most logical person here

Knight 243 391
  • 6 May
 Survii

@LιиgLιиg said:
this is my favorite documentary

also highly interesting

She needs to get to the point lol. Who cut the trees down? Why? Where is the equipment and why did no one record it? Why do the governments want to hide the BIG TREES from us?

Knight 243 391
 Survii

Great video, I watched it quite a while ago because I knew that all conspiracy theorists DO have brains and reasons for what they believe, so I watched this to try and get an insight into holocaust denial. Completely changed my view, I recommend watching this with 1:30h spare and an open mind.

Knight 243 391
  • 5 May
 Survii

@DerFurst said:
No idea what's going on there, but here's my general stance on these things

If a government itself terrorizes its citizens, then the "peacekeepers" are not keeping peace but rather the perpetuation chaos. Therefore, the "terrorists" or "radicals" who resist that system are indeed initiating force, but with the intention of achieving a true peace afterwards by removing the causes of chaos and disorder. However, if the "peacekeepers" do indeed keep a reasonable peace, and the "rebels" who resist that system are just violent thugs, then the government should remain. Therefore, "peacekeeper" and "terrorist" are entirely subjective terms. Government is not automatically good or bad. Those uprising are not automatically good or bad. You must look very deeply into both the intentions of the government and those uprising, and in the end, you may find that a bad solution is still better than a horrible one if there are no good answers.

Here's my take. The news we often receive of foreign humanitarian crises are always distorted by pro-US government propaganda through the mainstream media outlets. These mainstream media outlets always make it seem as if it's the US' job to intervene in these countries for some damnable reason. However, if Venezuela were to have a US intervention, it would be the end of that country's notion of "freedom," because they'd be under US occupation, in which point they'd be fully inducted into the international Jewish world order... No matter what happens in Venezuela, the US must not intervene if the country wants to remain independent.

From what I read, Venezuela is not entirely a US owned puppet like other countries, that their economic "instability" has been largely blown out of proportion by other countries, that other nations continue to make up statements damning Venezuela with plans to carve it up, and that the real economic situation Venezuela is facing has been exacerbated by Jewish international banks purposefully withdrawing their support.

The right wing parties, sadly, are likely US funded irregulars and terrorists who are vandalizing public institutions as a means to escalate the violence, making a US intervention seem ever the more needed.

tl;dr: another US staged coup in a foreign country so they can steal Venezuela for the interests of internationalist jewish bankers, just like always

personally I don't give a shit if Jews rule us, because they give us better damn lives than every other non-Jewish controlled place on Earth.

Knight 243 391
  • 4 May
 Survii

gold teeth shouldn't be able to be punched out tbh
reaction.png

Knight 243 391
  • 4 May
 Survii

@wierHL said:
wat is founder guild?

you just made the worst mistake of your life

Knight 243 391
  • 3 May
 Survii

@EatAtRedLobster said:

@Survii said:
I read the thread as "historical pornography" and got very disappointed when I opened it

Since this topic is regarding Lazy and he is not available to respond to you I will attempt to momentarily fill in for him.

Ahem...

"tbh that's because you're a fucking degenerate."

Why was he banned? I don't check these forums enough lol

Knight 243 391
  • 3 May
 Survii

I read the thread as "historical pornography" and got very disappointed when I opened it

Knight 243 391
  • 3 May
 Survii

MFW "but you get gold teeth"
reaction.png

Knight 243 391
  • 2 May
 Survii

@slutman said:
thermis-punch.gif

Seeing as this is your first post on the forums, I think you are going to fit in quite well.

Knight 243 391
  • 29 Apr
 Survii

Unfortunately it was only a paintball gun, and from 20m away but it still made me laugh. He went out and started screaming "OOUH SOMEONE SHOOT ME IN THA NUTS" sounding like Shrek.
Has anyone else done anything like this before?

Knight 243 391
  • 27 Apr
 Survii

@Sammy said:
Jax how many confirmed kills DO you have?

There isn't a big enough number tbh

Knight 243 391
  • 2
  • 27 Apr
 Survii

@Jax said:

@ToLazy4Name said:
also good kills jax glad to see you earning your war money

this is more accurate, ammo dump on my last field op in Australia

smokedbybrass.gif

I'm the one eating brass

Watch out, ISIS are stealing your tactics