Mordhau
 Survii
  • Likes received 131
  • Date joined 6 Sep '16
  • Last seen 10h
Private Message
106 131
  • 10h
 Survii

Got to question 5 noped out. Almost all political compass quizzes have authoritarian as synonyms for nazi. Just because I want to respect my own culture doesn't mean I want to also have slavery.

106 131
  • 10h
 Survii

Better than For Honor tbh

106 131
  • 19 Feb
 Survii

@crushed said:
Fist animations are placeholder.

10 likes
why

106 131
  • 16 Feb
 Survii

woah no need for that language mister
"ho"
smh

106 131
  • 16 Feb
 Survii

@Valmirius said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqB-EMqpsUA

When a fat middle class kid tells me that Communism is better than the welfare system when he's gonna be the first to be eaten when everyone is starving.

SAMMYCLASSICSONICFAN PTSD INTENSIFIES

106 131
  • 16 Feb
 Survii

Just get a shirt and write "kickstarter soon" on it

106 131
106 131
  • 15 Feb
 Survii

Thank fuck for nohbdy tbh, he kept me from unsubscribing from this thread. I really thought I was the only capitalist left fighting haha

106 131
  • 13 Feb
 Survii

@CaptainGaymer said:
please dont steal my copypasta i worked very hard on that

insert hard work + communism joke here

106 131
  • 12 Feb
 Survii

¯_(ツ)_/¯ Well thanks Vanguard for educating me in more indepth communist ideals rather than the surface (and slightly below) stuff. It is definitely an interesting theory but I think I'll stay capitalist :P

I think I'll unsubscribe from this thread now though. It's not really going anywhere, it was fun while it lasted :D

106 131
  • 11 Feb
 Survii

1- I read your response :D
2- Cuck only works as an insult to the left wing/ libertarians
3- Look at every communist country ever developed, even going with the Lenin-Marxist communist theory behind them- and what they all turned out like.
4- I'm not experienced here so I want an explanation: If the primary role of a communist government is to stop growth of large companies/ monopolies, who has the actual control over whether something happens or not? Surely those people in the government have control over the regular citizens, forming an inherent hierarchy that tailors towards totalitarianism?
5- Marx said capitalism would fail before communism would come into place. The capitalist world seems to be doing just fine right now imo.
6- "What Marx accomplished was to produce such a comprehensive, dramatic, and fascinating vision that it could withstand innumerable empirical contradictions, logical refutations, and moral revulsions at its effects. The Marxian vision took the overwhelming complexity of the real world and made the parts fall into place, in a way that was intellectually exhilarating and conferred such a sense of moral superiority that opponents could be simply labelled and dismissed as moral lepers or blind reactionaries. Marxism was – and remains – a mighty instrument for the acquisition and maintenance of political power" -Thomas Sowell

"It is the common error of Socialists to overlook the natural indolence of mankind; their tendency to be passive, to be the slaves of habit, to persist indefinitely in a course once chosen. Let them once attain any state of existence which they consider tolerable, and the danger to be apprehended is that they will thenceforth stagnate; will not exert themselves to improve, and by letting their faculties rust, will lose even the energy required to preserve them from deterioration. Competition may not be the best conceivable stimulus, but it is at present a necessary one, and no one can foresee the time when it will not be indispensable to progress." -John Stuart Mill

106 131
  • 10 Feb
 Survii

Sargon just did a response video to an anarcho-communist. Maybe some of you will watch this and realise how the working class DESPISE you middle-class political theorists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcSVfLV-2C4

106 131
  • 9 Feb
 Survii

@vanguard said:

@Survii said:

@TheDankestMeme said:

@Survii said:
socialism.jpg

actually the reality is more like:

hey what if we find a system to gives everyone somewhat equal life standards instead of letting half of the planet working all their life for no money while some others people are getting money all the time for not working.

yes but people HAVE to work lower class-middle class-upper class jobs. Its a fact of life. Buildings are nice, but barely anyone would want to be a builder. Cars are nice, but barely anyone would want to be a turbocharger installer and quality assurance manager. Computers are nice, but NO ONE would want to work in a sweatshop. Removing the gun of poverty nothing would happen or progress. The best case scenario would be the boring and hellish lives of people from the early middle-ages, but without disease. Our planet would be eaten by our sun and we would all die. 10/10 great species i r8 gud except for not actually doing anything productive in the long-run

"Fact of life" lmao. You make a lot of assumptions on what people want tbh, maybe, just maybe people don't want sweatshop jobs because they pay shit and have shitty conditions? And everyone wants "upper class" jobs because everyone wants "upper class" economic condition?

Quite reductionist, falacious and naive view on the "gun of poverty" tbh. Also a lot of claims without any prof or logic behind to support it. If removing the gun of poverty would make people do nothing, then how do you explain the things that happen in Spanish Civil war and in other N events/communities in a time where sweatshop labour was all that existed? In Spain production increased and there was almost (if not effectively) 0 unemployed people, while under capitalism, unemployement was huge and production was less efficient.

The biggest falacy, by far, is implying that capitalism is the best thing avaliable to advance technology, and also implyng that without capitalism there won't be any progress. Not only this is wrong on many levels, as you can't prof or use logic to justify said claim. I double dare u to do it, we already got into this theme and u got rekt remember. Just a reminder that under capitalism we will never see full automation of sweatshops and many other kinds of jobs, because this would end with the proletariat and thus class divided society, capitalism, money economy etc.

Its foolish to think that capitalism progress technology in all fields, it only does it in the areas help its preservation while effectively holding technology that would change the social order and mode of production. Just see how much military technology evolves and compare it to other kinds of technology areas; all the money that goes in it and shit that could be used for something infinitely more productive then "muh guns"

1- I didn't "get reked" you said smth about how space exploration gives us products
2- Yes, 0 unemployment because there weren't many gruelling jobs to be done in the past. Unless you want to retreat to a time where everyone is a blacksmith, a farmer, or a potter- you will HAVE to have jobs people don't like. If not- you lose your car, your technology etc.
3- Capitalism drives up the quality of products, and also lowers their price.
4- Capitalism does things better. Why would people stick in a (and i quote) "first come first served" society where people can get whatever quality product they want (if someone can actually be arsed to make it) when they could leave and go to a CAPITALIST country to be rewarded for their expertise. Brain-drain will mean your country would be left with benefits retards and people that do jobs they enjoy. The sewers would overflow and the bins would become their own lifeforms.
5- Capitalist countries would destroy your communist dreamland anyway. Oh cool I can get a phone if I wait 5 years or I can go to somewhere else and buy one immediately.
6- Are you planning a trade block with other countries? As if not, your country would be stripped of production instantly due to inflation.
7- Exports would also be unobtainable to your citizens (through trade block or pricing) or would dominate your markets so much it ends up like Cuba, where a taxi driver earns a doctors salary in a month. <-FUCKING CAPITALISM RUINING MORE PEOPLES LIVES GIVING MORE MONEY TO SOME WHY CANT EVERYONE BE POOR SMH

106 131
  • 9 Feb
 Survii

@TheDankestMeme said:

@Survii said:
socialism.jpg

actually the reality is more like:

hey what if we find a system to gives everyone somewhat equal life standards instead of letting half of the planet working all their life for no money while some others people are getting money all the time for not working.

yes but people HAVE to work lower class-middle class-upper class jobs. Its a fact of life. Buildings are nice, but barely anyone would want to be a builder. Cars are nice, but barely anyone would want to be a turbocharger installer and quality assurance manager. Computers are nice, but NO ONE would want to work in a sweatshop. Removing the gun of poverty nothing would happen or progress. The best case scenario would be the boring and hellish lives of people from the early middle-ages, but without disease. Our planet would be eaten by our sun and we would all die. 10/10 great species i r8 gud except for not actually doing anything productive in the long-run

106 131
  • 9 Feb
 Survii

@Huggles said:

@ToLazy4Name said:

@Huggles said:
alt right

Fuck you.

Is there a reason you don't like that term tho

Its pretty obvious tbh

106 131
 Survii

@CaptainGaymer said:
You only want to collectivize, but the bourgeois make the rules"

*bourgeoisie

106 131
  • 9 Feb
 Survii

@vanguard said:
Have you guys heard about them Diggers?

"For though you and your Ancestors got your Propriety by murther and theft, and you keep it by the same power from us, that have an equal right to the Land with you, by the righteous Law of Creation, yet we shall have no occasion of quarrelling (as you do) about that disturbing devil, called Particular propriety: For the Earth, with all her Fruits of Corn, Cattle, and such like, was made to be a common Store-house of Livelihood to all Mankinde, friend, and foe, without exception."

http://www.bilderberg.org/land/poor.htm

"And to prevent your scrupulous Objections, know this, That we Must neither buy nor sell; Money must not any longer (after our work of the Earths community is advanced) be the great god, that hedges in some, and hedges out others; for Money is but part of the Earth: And surely, the Righteous Creator, who is King, did never ordain, That unless some of Mankinde, do bring that Mineral (Silver and Gold) in their hands, to others of their own kinde, that they should neither be fed, nor be clothed; no surely, For this was the project of Tyrant-flesh (which Land-lords are branches of) to set his Image upon Money. And they make this unrighteous Law, That none should buy or sell, eat, or be clothed, or have any comfortable Livelihood among men, unless they did bring his Image stamped upon Gold or Silver in their hands."

A real medieval anarcho communist comune like monty fucking python!1 The movie is historicaly correct tbh and since medieval times they already knew communism was the future.

Got u Mr Lazy, become comunist now pls

socialism.jpg

106 131
  • 8 Feb
 Survii

@DerFurst said:

@vanguard said:

@DerFurst said:

@ToLazy4Name said:

@nohbdy said:
Do you not think there is any value in balancing the well-being of the economy with the well-being of the people?

I can scarcely think of any example of how you can effectively put the well-being of the people ahead of the well-being of the economy, so no. They tend to coincide.

remove jews

What change would it bring to simply take jews out and put someone else on their place to do the same thing tho?

I'll have to reveal to you the nature of Der Juden, Vanguard. Most people think of Jews as merely ordinary people like everyone else you know. They might have some have some odd religious traditions and wear funny clothing, but that's where all the strangeness ends. In your mind, they're harmless if not a bit superstitious. To you, it seems only like people blame them because they need a scapegoat to pin their problems on. To you, it seems like people who blame Jews for everything are simply "immature" or "simple minded," because "problems are more complex than that; people just like to blame external groups to shift blame from themselves."

That's how it appears to everyone who isn't in "the know." I was once in a position like this myself, which is why I know how you're thinking of me.

If you want to know why people think this way, it's not because people "need a scapegoat." Rather, they have educated themselves on the actions of the Jewish people themselves. From their discoveries, they naturally come to hate them, or view them as enemies. Hatred doesn't step from the desire to pin blame on one person, but as a direct understanding of just what the Jews have done to their countries and to the world. You would hate them if you knew - it's only natural to hate something who wants to destroy you, and has likely caused you grievous harm already.

money man.jpg

106 131
  • 8 Feb
 Survii

@vanguard said:

@DerFurst said:

@ToLazy4Name said:

@nohbdy said:
Do you not think there is any value in balancing the well-being of the economy with the well-being of the people?

I can scarcely think of any example of how you can effectively put the well-being of the people ahead of the well-being of the economy, so no. They tend to coincide.

remove jews

What change would it bring to simply take jews out and put someone else on their place to do the same thing tho?

Remove Islam tbh