Mordhau
 Duguesclin
  • Likes received 56
  • Date joined 5 Oct '18

This user is suspended.

Private Message

132 56
  • 15 Feb
 Duguesclin

@Xatrian said:
yes it's a great conspiracy of progressive SJWs, they're going to ruin mordygame by making giant tittymonsters and the evil NEGRO omnipresent and inescapable, cancel your preorders now

You go mad, I understand. Anyway there is no conspiracy, the only conspiracy is the fact leftists do leftists game, which is logical and not really complicated nor illegal,etc.... Now don't use the "You are racist" rethoric against me or you will only pass as a leftist. I try to love my fellow humans that are blacks as I try with my white fellows. Tittymonsters are not the subject. Also I don't call for boycott, this is a personal decision for people to take.

132 56

@Xatrian said:
oh look they follow someone in the HEMA community, I wonder what could possibly have caused them to do that lmao

Oh look the only one person of the HEMA community they follow is a trans feminist, I wonder what could possibly have caused them to do that LMAO.

132 56
  • 15 Feb
 Duguesclin

@Xatrian said:
you're just saying things that don't make someone a progressive do make someone a progressive, this is stupid lmao

"I follow a trans and a progressive journal but that does not make me a progressive lmao guys" :^) Transexuality is progressive (seems I need to specify this). Also this..., Samantha the sword, seems to be prominent in feminism in sword/hema milieu as one screen shows.

the choices are "nazi" and "progressive" holy fuck lmao

Stop being dishonest because you have no argument. You know I use the word "nazi" as the generic word or slander used to designate everything that is not left wing. And that I use it as an example. The abuse of "lmao" seems to indicate your stress.

132 56
  • 15 Feb
 Duguesclin

@Frise said:
lmao this guy called Triternion progressives, close this shitpost already

They are, and it's official !
(but if they are nazis in secret, then they are selling their ass, which can be considered worst)

132 56
  • 15 Feb
 Duguesclin

@Xatrian said:
Supporting the ability to choose your sex in a videogame doesn't make you a progressive. If that is your criteria for being extremely left wing, then everyone to the left of Milton Friedman is a progressive.

You deliberately ignore the first point.
Following a trans in twitter when it's in it's bio with an official account makes you a progressive, period. Officially Mordhau is progressive. And that explain why they want muh equality in their videogame even if no one was happy when women appeared, instead the contrary, as proved in my post.

132 56

@Xatrian said:
Business decisions =/= political views, especially one as inane as this

When you choose a progressive public appearance you should expect to be judged according to this, it's now your identity you choose.
Anyway what is worst ? A progressive or someone that is not but sell his ass to progressives ? Someone with progressives, no matter it's heart (no one can see and judge this part) is a progressive.

132 56
  • 15 Feb
 Duguesclin

@Xatrian said:
"Progressives"

do you even know Crush or Jax lmao

Well, the official Mordhau twitter follow a trans, and that's in it's bio. Have an actual argument to counter that, at least.

132 56
  • 15 Feb
 Duguesclin

well, I need to repost it since the previous topic is 404 now. This is neither a call to boycott nor a hate thread. It's just a post intended to give a logical explanation and a new light on the "female drama".

femalegate.png

http://archive.is/WrMqi
TL;DR : People don't want females in Mordhau but devs want to add them because they are progressives.

To contradict me you should prove there is the same amount of people that want females in this game in comparison to people that don't. And to make this proper comparison go to MORDHAU Devblog - #3 Customization on youtube (the youtube screens I took are from there). Now ctrl + f "female" or "women", there is 0 comments of people positive about females ! Yet there is far more against as shown in the screens I posted. This proves adding females is just a disadvantage.

132 56
  • 21 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@Runagate said:
Why does fiction need to respect the laws of our world?

For the same reason you don't want a scenery with magic carpets in the sky.
A game is made by rules which create its identity.
Artist create more interesting works when they have constraints.

132 56
  • 21 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@Naleaus said:
Just settle this stupid fucking useless argument with some lore.
Mordhau takes place in a world similar in most respects to ours, but different in a few key ways. Unlike Earth, planet Xoram has weaker gravity, as evidenced by how you float a bit while jumping, or your momentum when swinging a large weapon throws your forward.
This also leads the human-like Geaches to have differing physiology. Muscle mass between the genders are overall more similar, with less variance outside of appearance between individuals. This is evidenced by consistent hit to kills, weak archer damage, and people taking a few big hits to die.
Unfortunately, Geaches never mastered smithing (though they were skilled at building with rocks) so their armor is weaker than our equivalents, which is why plate armor is pierced by arrows.
Also, there are no children, new Geach bodies are summoned to hold the souls of ones that died in battle by their God, Hsurc. A fickle and stubborn God, who answers no prayers and watches the fighting for enjoyment, pleased with how everything looks perfect from a distance. He tinkers from afar, but still the Geaches cry for vision and reasoning.
There, now it's all justified and we can move on, ok?

Funny but that change nothing. Gameplay arrangements for the sake of the support can't justify a change of world. Your whole lore is justified by the fact there will be females. That's a tautology.

132 56
  • 21 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@Jax said:
I was under the assumption that we would be creating a different body for females, and so the armor would have to be fitted to that body as well. Turns out we can just use the same system we have for the body slider (fat/skinny/strong) to do this.

So women will only be skinny dudes ? Ahahah what a game !
You waste hours on this or you make traps with female voices. Lmao.
>inb4 Someone post a study proving there were trap knights in the medieval era

132 56
  • 21 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

Thisinsteadofbetterfeatures.png

Let's waste hours of development time on this ! It's totally worth it !

132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@TheKingInTheNorth said:
Women warriors exist in Mordhau lore and that should really be the end of the discussion tbqh.

Person A : Why add women in Mordhau ?
Person B : Because we add women in Mordhau and that should really be the end of the discussion tbqh.

132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@Runagate said:
Also proof of it is weapons and armour that existed 500 years apart from each other are seen used in the very same battlefields. If it was our world there would indeed be no female knights or vikings with zweihänders in the same fight. But you don't seem to understand this.

Tell me, how do you go from "knights from different periods of the medieval age" to "knights from another world" ?
With female knights.
Females knights don't respect any of the laws of our world (historical for all the medieval era as social, moral, biological,...) while knights of different period of time just makes anachronism within the medieval age and within the chivalry/fighting elite. That's why people will have to say "it's another world" in order to justify the fact there is women. But without them, there is absolutely no evidence it's not our world.

ps: I don't think a lot of people will use vikings with zweihänders (if not only because there is plenty of other combinations).

132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@Rattsknecht said:
This game is not set in our world, get over it man

The proof of that is women knights.

  • So we have women knights because the game is in another world
  • The game is in another world because there is women knights
    Repeat ad infinitum.
132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@TheKingInTheNorth said:
Well if we completely ignore the multiple topics and pages of arguments made and focus on this one, then yes, women will not be completely hidden. Otherwise there would be no point to add them at all.
What you're asking for is immersion, but you ignore that this fantasy setting does have women warriors. The world is internally consistent. That should really be the end of the immersion argument.
As for realism/historical accuracy, besides the fact that women did have combat roles even if they were a minority, this argument does not apply for a fictional setting in the first place.
But this has been pointed out so many times before that it's really weird people keep coming back to it. There is literally no valid argument to be made against women in this game, taking everything into account.

"fantasy setting", stop this annoying lie. Fiction =/= fantasy
If the game were in a fantasy setting there would be no problem seeing women fighting, the player could have easily understood "well the world of the game have other rules" and could easily got over it. But it is the medieval era of our world so women knights are totally intruders in this setting.
>inb4 historical accuracy details in game like period of the weapons
The same argument were used in favor of women in battlefield V.

132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@TheKingInTheNorth said:

@Duguesclin said:

@TheKingInTheNorth said:
Literally unplayable, how am I supposed to get immersed in my medieval game with such scantly clad thots walking around?

Can't you see it's a man ? xD

-> The joke

-> Your head

You're very close to seeing the point though. Very close.

Got the joke.

Don't got the pertinence of the argument and of the photo though. Yeah, there will be no possibility to make sexy characters.
But since I clearly said the sexy part isn't the only problem, is your argument : "Women will be added but hided, so the problem will not be visible" ? But women will still look like women anyway, outfits don't cover everything, and don't cover voices.

132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@TheKingInTheNorth said:
Literally unplayable, how am I supposed to get immersed in my medieval game with such scantly clad thots walking around?

Can't you see it's a man ? xD

132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@Stouty said:
You haven't backed the game. Every post you've ever made is about wahmen. Where did you come from? Do you play melee games? Why don't you ever discuss other facets of the game?

Well I signed up with my steam account, I guess at least the devs can see I play a lot of melee and medieval games. I'm a lurker most of the time, and since I am in a "polemic" I don't feel I can contribute in other things in this forum. Also, the game seems really great on the other points imo, and I believe devs will do a good work on them. The opinion of what you could consider "strangers to the initial community" is important since most of the players will be strangers. Exterior opinions are fundamental in everything since for example everybody knows the ability of forums to transform into circle-jerking communities.

132 56
  • 19 Dec '18
 Duguesclin

@MrGhostTheFlyingFlail said:
Same Hitbox. To select a gender should purely be a cosmetic difference nothing else.

I tend to think this game should be cosmetically coherent (I mean medieval), everything in medieval games is not about gameplay. The gameplay must be immersive, but the universe too.